Home Blog Page 25

Daniel Hemric NCTS Martinsville Speedway Recap

Black’s Tire 200 – Race Results

Venue: Martinsville Speedway

FINISH: 15th
Start: 15th
Laps Led: 0
NCTS Point Standings Position: 8th

Hemric Runs Through Adversity at Martinsville to Finish Top-15

Daniel Hemric made a late comeback for a 15th-place result in Friday night’s slugfest at Martinsville Speedway. The driver of the No. 19 Arnott Suspension Products Chevrolet Silverado RST responded after being collected in a multi-truck incident after halfway to rebound and record a top-15 run in the second-to-last event on the calendar. Heading into next week’s season finale, Hemric resides eighth in the NASCAR CRAFTSMAN Trucks Series points standings.

Hemric lined up 15th for the green flag and managed to advance forward in the opening laps. He had moved to 13th position by the race’s first caution flag on lap 37, which offered an opportunity to elect a contrarian pit strategy. Crew chief Kevin Bellicourt brought Hemric to pit lane for four tires, fuel, and an adjustment to aid the lack of front grip. Hemric used those fresh tires to go from 15th on the lap 45 restart back up to 13th by the Stage 1 checkered on lap 50.

With a significant tires advantage versus the rest of the field, Hemric stayed on track during the stage caution and made gains over the next 43-lap run. By lap 63, Hemric cracked the top-10 but began to be hampered by a lack of braking power on the tight corner entries. Despite the hindrance, Hemric was scored 11th at the end of Stage 2 on lap 100.

He pitted with all lead lap trucks during the second stage caution for four tires, fuel, and a track bar adjustment, which positioned him 15th for the restart on lap 115. Two successive cautions kept the field bunched up and triggered a multi-truck incident in Turn 1 on lap 136, which collected Hemric. His Arnott Suspension Products Chevy sustained minor nose damage in a spin but was able to continue. Despite restarting 23rd, Hemric was able to advance back into the top-15 on the final 12-lap run of the evening and took the checkered flag in 15th position.

Daniel Hemric Quote:

“Definitely a trying evening for our No. 19 group. We were limited on entry and lacked rotation with the front tires on our Arnott Chevrolet. We had pretty decent pace in the first stage and gave ourselves a good opportunity on fresher tires before halfway. Unfortunately, the aggression ramps up with every restart later in the race and we got caught up in that mess into Turn 1. Glad this group stayed in the fight and get back to where we did at the end.”

Martinsville Speedway Photos

At Arnott, we believe every driver deserves a suspension system that restores confidence, comfort, and control. That belief drives our mission to engineer smarter, longer-lasting solutions that elevate the driving experience. We see every challenge in a vehicle’s suspension not as a failure, but as anopportunity to innovate, improve, and redefine reliability.

What inspires us most is knowing the difference our work makes every day. From the first idea to the final product, our teams are guided by a shared commitment to quality, innovation, and pride in craftsmanship. We do what we do because we care about the people behind the wheel, and we want every ride to feel as good as it did the day the vehicle first hit the road.

Christian Eckes NCTS Martinsville Speedway Recap

Black’s Tire 200 – Race Results

Venue: Martinsville Speedway

FINISH: 10th
Start: 7th
Stage 1: 6th
Stage 2: 7th
Laps Led: 0
NCTS Point Standings Position: 5th

Eckes Records Top-10 in Topsy Turvy Martinsville Outing

Christian Eckes endured a volatile night at Martinsville Speedway on Friday to record a 10th-place finish in the season’s penultimate round. The driver of the No. 91 NAPA Auto Care Chevrolet Silverado RST earned points in both stages and his 15th top-10 result of the 2026 campaign. He scored the seventh-most points on the evening with 36 and sits fifth in the NASCAR CRAFTSMAN Trucks Series (NCTS) Chase standings entering next week’s season finale.

Eckes began the 200-lapper from the seventh position, with a rebooted white and blue NAPA Auto Care color scheme. The opening segment ran under green flag conditions for the first 37 laps, during which Eckes began to combat a loose balance. He took control of sixth position as the first caution waved and efficiently protected it on the ensuing restart to earn five points at the end of Stage 1 on lap 50.

The No. 91 team stayed on track with the majority of the lead lap trucks during the stage caution and restarted sixth on lap 59. The event’s green flag flavor continued in Stage 2 as a 43-lap run immediately followed. After restarting on the outside lane, Eckes fell into line in seventh on lap 63 and held that position until the second stage checkers waved on lap 100.

Crew chief Dave Elenz brought Eckes to pit road under the second stage caution period for four tires, fuel, and a chassis adjustment to improve the NAPA Auto Care Chevy’s forward drive and rotation capability. Eckes restarted ninth on lap 115 but quickly faced a significantly unpredictable balance. After falling to 16th, he pitted under the lap 129 caution flag to address the issue. He restarted 21st on lap 136 and picked his way forward throughout a flurry of cautions and an excessively tight condition. By lap 172, Eckes rejoined the top-15 and took advantage of the night’s final restart on lap 189 to advance from 13th to take the checkered flag in 10th position.

Christian Eckes Quote:

“Certainly not what we were hoping for tonight. Our balance wasn’t ever consistent on our NAPA Auto Care Chevy. We were okay in the first stage, just too free and lacked overall grip compared to everyone else. It got really free on entry after our first pit stop and started plowing tight after halfway. We’ll get to the bottom of it, make improvements and we’ll try to finish the year strong at Homestead next week.”

Martinsville Speedway Photos

Through nearly 6,000 auto parts stores and over 18,000 auto care centers in the U.S., NAPA has America’s largest network of parts and care. The NAPA Network is supported by nationwide distribution centers with approximately 800,000 available parts, accessories and supplies. Widely recognized for quality parts, rapid availability and knowledgeable people, NAPA Auto Parts stores serve automotive service professionals, do-it-yourselfers and everyday drivers with quality parts, accessories and supplies to keep cars, trucks and equipment performing safely and efficiently. In 2025, NAPA proudly celebrates its 100th anniversary by honoring its innovative spirit and centennial legacy through community initiatives and a renewed commitment to driving the industry forward for the next century. For more information, visit www.napaonline.com.

Parker Kligerman scheduled for third Truck start with Kaulig Racing at Homestead

Photo by John Knittel for SpeedwayMedia.com.

Parker Kligerman will cap off Kaulig Racing’s Free Agent Program by piloting the organization’s No. 25 RAM 1500 entry for next weekend’s NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series season-finale event at Homestead-Miami Speedway.

The news comes as Kligerman, a 36-year-old native of Westport, Connecticut, made two previous Truck starts with Kaulig earlier this season. He finished 11th in his first start at Texas Motor Speedway in early May before he finished 16th at Michigan International Speedway in early June. Kligerman would then compete in the next two Truck events at San Diego’s Naval Base Coronado and Lime Rock Park with Henderson Motorsports and Spire Motorsports, respectively. During the latter event at Lime Rock, he notched a fourth-place result.

The 2026 finale at Homestead will mark Kligerman’s fourth start in the Truck division at Homestead, a track in which he has notched three top-10 results, including a ninth-place result during his latest start in 2022 and his highest-finishing result of seventh place in 2012. The Connecticut native has also recorded a pair of seventh-place results in five O’Reilly Auto Parts Series starts at Homestead and a single Cup Series start at the venue, the latter of which occurred in 2013.

“Getting the opportunity to jump into the No. 25 Ram 1500 this year has been an absolute blast,” Kligerman said. “Ram created something genuinely cool with the Free Agent Program, and getting the call to come back a third time and close out the season means a lot to me. Homestead is one of the most challenging, fun tracks on the schedule because you’re constantly running up against the wall and the weather is usually beautiful. It’s my favorite place to end the season.”

“This program was designed to generate buzz and give fans something unique every single week,” Kligerman added. “To be trusted with the wheel for three races—and to bring the curtain down on Ram’s comeback season at Homestead—is an honor. Kaulig Racing built a powerful five-truck team this year, and we’re looking to end the year with a great finish.”

Kaulig Racing launched its free-agent driver program ahead of its inaugural Craftsman Truck Series campaign in November 2025. The program features various competitors from multiple racing divisions and disciplines. Each will compete in at least one Truck event in one of Kaulig’s RAM 1500 entries numbered 25. The competitors who compete in the entry would not compete for the 2026 Truck Series driver’s championship. They will, however, be evaluated by their on-track performance for a season-ending program prize.

Currently, Kaulig Racing’s No. 25 entry, which is led by crew chief Dan Stillman, is ranked in 27th place in the 2026 owner’s standings after 24 of the 25-race schedule. The entry is one of five that is fielded by Kaulig. It competes alongside the No. 10 entry piloted by Corey LaJoie, the No. 12 entry piloted by rookie Brenden “Butterbean” Queen, the No. 14 entry piloted by newcomer Timothy “Mini” Tyrrell and the No. 16 entry piloted by Justin Haley. 

Tony Stewart, Ty Dillon, Colin Braun, Corey LaJoie, Carson Ferguson, Parker Kligerman, AJ Allmendinger, Clint Bowyer, Travis Pastrana, Jamie McMurray, Ryan Newman, Conor Daly, Elliott Sadler and Regan Smith have piloted the entry at least once. Dillon, Braun, Ferguson, Kligerman, Daly, Smith and Stewart have each piloted the No. 25 entry multiple times, with Ferguson being the latest competitor to drive the entry at Martinsville Speedway.

At the conclusion of the finale at Homestead, Kligerman will tie Braun, Daly and Ferguson with the most starts in the No. 25 Kaulig entry at three apiece. The entry’s best on-track result is sixth place, which was achieved by Allmendinger at Watkins Glen International in early May, as Kligerman strives to cap off the Free Agent Program on a strong note at Homestead amid Kaulig Racing’s inaugural campaign in the Truck Series division.

Parker Kligerman’s third Craftsman Truck Series start of the 2026 season at Homestead-Miami Speedway is scheduled to occur next Friday, November 6, at 7:30 p.m. ET on FS1, NASCAR Racing Network and SiriusXM.

Free Online Diagramming App: Options for Studying and Memory Retention

Photo by depositphotos at https://depositphotos.com/

A free online diagramming app lets you turn study notes into a visual you can review. Adobe Acrobat’s mind map maker is one free choice: upload notes as a PDF, DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, or TXT file up to 100MB, and it builds a mind map with the source shown behind select branches, with no sign-up or credit card required.

Students who want free platforms for visual diagrams to support studying and memory retention should know what a diagram does and does not do. It organizes ideas, but remembering comes from retrieval: Dunlosky and colleagues rated practice testing and distributed practice highest in their review of study techniques. The sections below cover free tools, then how to use them for review. Free plans change, so confirm limits on each tool’s page.

Free Open Source Mind Mapping: Which Tools Work Without an Account?

Several free open source tools need no account. Freeplane runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux, saves maps on your computer, and has no paid tier. diagrams.net is free with no sign-up required, and you choose where files are saved. Excalidraw is an MIT-licensed whiteboard with a hand-drawn look, an infinite canvas, real-time collaboration, and export to PNG and SVG. Its hosted app autosaves to your browser and works offline. Markmap, also MIT-licensed, turns Markdown headings and lists into a mind map, online or through plugins for VS Code, Vim, and Emacs. Excalidraw’s hand-drawn look keeps diagrams informal, which suits quick sketches you will redraw from memory.

Free Concept Mapping Software for Education: Which Choices Cost Nothing for Students?

CmapTools is free for educational use, lets you attach resources to concepts, and has a free Cmap Cloud account and a web version. IHMC, the research institute behind the method, says good concept maps answer a focus question and run from general to specific. Miro’s Education plan is free for students at accredited institutions, and FigJam is free for verified students and educators. Canva offers free concept map templates, and Canva Education is free for K-12 teachers and students. Adobe Acrobat’s mind map maker makes mind maps rather than labeled concept maps, so use it for a first draft and add linking words yourself. Start with one concept map per unit and add linking words to every line.

Free Diagram Maker for Education: Visual Learning, Mind Maps, and One Platform to Keep Them

If you want one platform for everything, pick a whiteboard that handles diagrams and mind maps. Miro’s free plan includes three editable boards, unlimited members, and 10 AI credits a month. FigJam includes a mind map template and is free for verified students and educators. Lucidchart’s free plan includes three editable documents with 75 shapes each. Coggle’s free plan includes three private diagrams and real-time collaboration, and MindMeister’s free plan includes three mind maps. If you prefer no sign-up at all, use diagrams.net or Excalidraw. Keep every diagram for one course in the same platform so you can review them in order before an exam. The table compares what each platform makes and what the free plan allows.

PlatformWhat it makesFree plan
Adobe Acrobat mind map makerMind maps from uploaded filesFree, no sign-up required; files up to 100MB each
ExcalidrawHand-drawn diagrams and whiteboardsFree and open source
diagrams.netExact diagramsFree; no sign-up required
MiroWhiteboards, diagrams, mind maps3 editable boards; unlimited members
FigJamWhiteboards with a mind map templateFree for verified students and educators
LucidchartDiagrams3 editable documents; 75 shapes each
CoggleMind maps3 private diagrams; unlimited public diagrams
MindMeisterMind maps3 mind maps; unlimited collaborators

Free Diagramming Plan: What Limits Should You Expect?

Expect a count limit, an export limit, or both. MindMeister, Coggle, and Lucidchart allow about three maps or documents, and Miro keeps three boards editable. Exports vary: Coggle’s free plan includes PDF and image download, Miro’s free plan allows only low-resolution board exports, and MindMeister adds file exports on a paid plan. Privacy varies too, since Coggle’s free plan includes unlimited public diagrams and every Miro free board is open to all team members by default. Open source tools have no plan limits at all. Decide which diagram you will review most, and keep that one in the tool with the loosest limits. Check student discounts before paying; Miro’s Education plan is free for students at accredited institutions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do diagrams really help me remember?

They help you organize, which makes review easier. Memory improves most when you test yourself. Dunlosky’s review did not evaluate mind maps, and it rated practice testing and distributed practice highest. Build the diagram, then redraw it from memory on a different day and compare the two. Space the redraws across several days.

Which free diagramming app works offline?

Excalidraw’s hosted app works offline and autosaves to your browser, according to its project page. Freeplane saves maps as files on your computer. Cloud tools such as Miro, Coggle, and MindMeister need a connection, so export a copy before you travel or sit an exam. Test offline mode once before you rely on it.

Are my diagrams private?

It depends on the tool. Excalidraw’s collaboration is end-to-end encrypted, according to its project page. Coggle’s free plan includes public diagrams, and Miro’s free boards are open to all team members. Adobe Acrobat deletes uploaded files unless you sign in to save them. Check each tool’s settings before adding personal notes.

Chrome Hearts Hoodie – The Honest Guide Before You Buy

Hoodies are the easiest thing in the world to own. You probably have three or four in your closet right now, and none of them cost more than a nice dinner. So when someone tells you a Chrome Hearts hoodie costs several times that, the first reaction is usually a raised eyebrow.

Then you see one in person. The fabric hangs differently, the graphics look sharper, and the small silver-toned details catch the light. That’s when the eyebrow comes down, and the questions begin. This guide answers those questions without the hype.

First, What Is a Chrome Hearts Hoodie, Really?

Chrome Hearts is a Los Angeles label that started in 1988 as a leather and silver workshop. Its clothing came later, but it inherited the same dark, handcrafted attitude. A hoodie from the brand is less of a casual layer and more of a wearable piece of that identity.

Most people think of two main versions:

  • The pullover hoodie, usually with bold front or back graphics and the brand’s lettering.
  • The zip-up hoodie, which is often the more recognized of the two, thanks to its cross-style details and signature pulls.

Both are heavier and more structured than ordinary streetwear hoodies, which is a big part of the appeal.

What You Notice When You Hold One

Forget the logo for a second. These are the things that usually stand out first.

The weight. The cotton is thick and dense. It feels like a piece meant to last through years of wear, not a single season of trends.

The print and embroidery. Graphics tend to be crisp and deliberate, with clean edges. Cheaper hoodies crack, fade, or blur much sooner.

The hardware. On zip-ups especially, the zipper pull and small metal accents are part of the design. They add weight and a sense of finish you don’t get from standard zippers.

The stitching. Seams are tight and even. It’s the kind of detail you only appreciate after the hoodie survives its hundredth wear.

Why Do People Pay So Much for a Hoodie?

It’s a fair question, and the answer isn’t just “because of the name.”

Part of it is material. Heavy cotton, quality printing, and custom hardware cost more to produce. Part of it is labor, since much of the brand’s output is made in small runs rather than massive factories. And part of it is scarcity: when supply is limited and demand is high, prices rise, and the resale market follows.

There’s also a cultural layer. Years of musicians, designers, and fashion insiders wearing the brand have turned it into a status symbol. You’re paying for the garment, but you’re also paying for what it signals. Whether that’s worth it is personal, and nobody should pressure you either way.

How Much Does a Chrome Hearts Hoodie Cost?

Expect luxury pricing. New hoodies generally sit well above ordinary designer sweatshirts, often landing in the high hundreds and climbing past $1,000 for heavily detailed or limited pieces. On the resale market, popular or rare designs can sell for much more than their original price, while worn or common pieces may sell for less.

Prices shift with seasons, collaborations, and demand, so always check a current listing before you set your budget.

Does It Run Big or Small?

This is where many first-time buyers get surprised. Chrome Hearts hoodies often have a roomy, slightly boxy shape, and the thick fabric adds to that bulk.

A few practical tips:

If you like a relaxed streetwear look, your usual size will probably work.

If you prefer a neater fit, consider sizing down, especially in the shoulders.

If you’re between sizes, think about how you’ll layer it. A hoodie worn over a jacket needs more room than one worn over a tee.

If you’re buying used, ask for chest, length, and sleeve measurements. Tag sizes alone can mislead.

Trying one on in a boutique is always best, but if that’s not possible, measurements are your safest guide.

Styling It Without Looking Like You Tried Too Hard

The best part about a statement hoodie is that it does most of the styling for you. Here are a few ways to wear it well.

  • Keep the bottom half simple. Straight-leg jeans or plain black trousers balance the visual weight on top.
  • Choose shoes with some presence. Chunky sneakers or boots match the heaviness of the fabric.
  • Skip the extra logos. One loud brand piece is plenty. Two or three compete with each other.
  • Layer with intention. A leather or denim jacket over a zip-up looks sharp, but make sure the best details stay visible.
  • Mind the colors. Black, grey, and white are the safest choices and make the graphics pop.

Pairing It With Jeans

A Chrome Hearts hoodie and a good pair of jeans make one of the easiest and most reliable combinations out there. If your hoodie has heavy graphics or cross details, go for straight-leg jeans in a dark wash. They balance the bold design on top and keep the outfit looking clean. If you want to take the look up a notch, Chrome Hearts jeans are the natural match, especially a plain black pair, since the brand’s details work well together without competing. 

Baggy or relaxed-fit jeans bring out the boxy shape of the hoodie for a proper streetwear vibe, while slim jeans give a sharper, neater look. Black or faded grey denim is the safest pick, though washed indigo also looks great when the hoodie is black or white. Finish with chunky sneakers or leather boots, and the outfit feels complete without looking forced.

Confidence matters more than the outfit formula. Wear it like it’s just another hoodie, and it looks effortless.

Spotting a Fake Before It Costs You

Replicas are everywhere because the brand is so popular, and some are surprisingly convincing in photos. Here’s what to inspect closely.

  • Fabric quality. Thin, scratchy, or overly stretchy fabric is a bad sign.
  • Print sharpness. Authentic graphics have clean outlines, while fakes often look fuzzy or uneven.
  • Hardware feel. Zipper pulls and metal parts should feel solid, not light or rough.
  • Labels and stitching. Look for neat, consistent sewing and properly finished tags.
  • Price and seller. A hoodie priced far below market is almost always fake. Stick to official stores or authenticated resale platforms.

When in doubt, ask for more photos or walk away. A good seller won’t mind.

Taking Care of It

Good care protects both the fabric and the graphics.

  • Turn the hoodie inside out before washing.
  • Use cold water and a gentle detergent.
  • Avoid the dryer when possible and let it air dry flat.
  • Don’t iron directly over prints or embroidery.
  • Store it folded instead of on a hanger, since heavy cotton can stretch at the shoulders.

Washing less often also helps. Spot cleaning handles most small marks.

Final Verdict

Is a Chrome Hearts hoodie worth it? If you just want something warm and comfortable, probably not. Plenty of good hoodies cost a fraction of the price. But if you love heavy, well-made clothing, distinctive details, and a piece with real cultural weight, it can be a genuinely satisfying purchase.

The best way to approach it is simple: pick a style you’ll wear often, double-check the size, and buy only from trusted sources. Do that, and your hoodie will stay a favorite long after the hype around it moves on.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does a Chrome Hearts hoodie cost?

Most Chrome Hearts hoodies start in the high hundreds and can pass $1,000, depending on the design and details. Rare or limited pieces often sell for more on the resale market.

Where can I buy a Chrome Hearts hoodie?

Official Chrome Hearts boutiques and the brand’s website are the safest choices. For sold-out or older designs, authenticated resale platforms like Grailed, The RealReal, and Vestiaire Collective are worth checking.

Does a Chrome Hearts hoodie run big?

It often has a roomy, boxy fit, so many people size down for a neater look. If you like a relaxed style, your normal size usually works.

How can I tell if a Chrome Hearts hoodie is real?

Check the fabric weight, print sharpness, hardware quality, and stitching. A price that seems too low is another strong warning sign.

Do Chrome Hearts hoodies hold their value?

Rare and limited pieces in good condition often do. Resale value still depends on condition and demand, so it’s never guaranteed.

Fast Turn PCB: Expert Rigid Flex PCB Manufacturer for Advanced Circuit Designs

Modern electronic products require circuit boards that deliver reliable electrical performance while fitting into increasingly compact and complex designs. As devices become smaller and more sophisticated, traditional rigid printed circuit boards may not provide enough flexibility to accommodate every mechanical and electrical requirement. Rigid-flex PCB technology offers an effective solution by combining rigid circuit sections with flexible circuitry in a single integrated assembly.

Choosing an experienced rigid flex PCB manufacturer is essential for businesses developing advanced electronics. From medical equipment and aerospace systems to automotive controls and consumer devices, rigid-flex circuit boards help engineers optimize space, simplify connections, and support complex product layouts.

Fast Turn PCB is a relevant consideration for businesses exploring PCB manufacturing solutions for advanced circuit designs. Understanding rigid-flex technology, manufacturing capabilities, design considerations, and quality requirements can help companies select a suitable manufacturing partner for their projects.

What Is a Rigid-Flex PCB?

A rigid-flex PCB combines rigid flex pcb manufacturer sections with flexible circuit layers. The rigid portions provide stable mounting areas for electronic components, while the flexible sections create electrical connections between different parts of the assembly.

Unlike conventional electronic assemblies that connect multiple rigid boards through separate wires or connectors, a rigid-flex design can integrate these connections into one structure. This arrangement can reduce assembly complexity and help engineers make better use of limited internal space.

A typical rigid-flex circuit board may include the following elements:

  • Rigid circuit sections: Provide structural support for components, connectors, and other electronic parts.
  • Flexible circuit sections: Connect different board areas and accommodate specific bending requirements.
  • Conductive copper layers: Carry electrical signals and power throughout the circuit.
  • Insulating materials: Separate conductive layers and provide electrical protection.
  • Coverlay: Protects conductive traces in flexible areas while leaving designated connection points accessible.
  • Bonding materials: Join the different layers to create an integrated circuit structure.
  • Stiffeners: Provide additional support in selected areas when required by the design.

The exact construction depends on the number of layers, electrical requirements, board dimensions, operating environment, and intended application.

Why Choose an Expert Rigid Flex PCB Manufacturer?

Rigid-flex circuit boards involve more complex manufacturing considerations than many standard rigid PCBs. Different materials must work together while maintaining electrical performance, mechanical stability, and dimensional accuracy.

An experienced rigid flex PCB manufacturer can help evaluate these requirements before production begins.

1. Advanced Manufacturing Knowledge

Rigid-flex manufacturing requires an understanding of rigid laminates, flexible materials, copper structures, bonding systems, and layer stack-ups.

Manufacturing expertise helps ensure that the proposed construction is suitable for the intended application. It also helps identify design limitations before they cause production delays.

2. Accurate Layer Alignment

Multilayer rigid-flex boards may contain numerous conductive and insulating layers that must align correctly.

Accurate alignment supports reliable electrical connections and helps ensure that the finished board meets its mechanical specifications.

3. Reliable Rigid-to-Flex Transitions

The transition between rigid and flexible sections is one of the most important design considerations.

Poorly planned transitions may create stress concentrations that damage copper traces or insulating materials. Appropriate material selection, routing, and layer arrangements help reduce these risks.

4. Support for Complex Circuit Designs

Advanced electronics may require high-density routing, closely spaced components, multiple conductive layers, and specialized board shapes.

A capable manufacturer should evaluate whether the requested specifications are compatible with its fabrication processes and quality controls.

5. Better Design Coordination

Manufacturing feedback can help engineers improve board layouts, clarify technical requirements, and identify potential production issues.

Early communication between the design team and manufacturer can reduce unnecessary revisions and support a more predictable manufacturing process.

Key Benefits of Rigid-Flex PCB Technology

Rigid-flex technology offers several advantages for electronic products that require compact construction and integrated electrical connections.

Reduced Space Requirements

Traditional electronic assemblies may use several rigid boards connected through cables, wire harnesses, or separate connectors.

Rigid-flex technology can combine these elements into one integrated assembly, potentially reducing the overall footprint and simplifying the internal layout.

This is especially useful in products with narrow enclosures or limited space for wiring.

Lower Assembly Complexity

Using fewer separate connectors and cables can simplify certain assembly operations.

A well-designed rigid-flex circuit may reduce the number of individual components that must be installed and secured during final product assembly.

However, the overall savings depend on the design, production quantity, and manufacturing costs.

Improved Mechanical Integration

Flexible circuit sections can follow defined paths through a product while rigid areas support components.

This arrangement helps engineers connect electronic modules positioned at different angles or in separate compartments.

Potential Reliability Improvements

Every separate connector and cable introduces another connection that may require inspection or maintenance.

Integrating connections into a rigid-flex structure can reduce some of these potential failure points. Nevertheless, overall reliability depends on design quality, materials, fabrication processes, and operating conditions.

Support for Advanced Product Designs

Rigid-flex PCBs enable designers to develop electronic assemblies that would be difficult to implement using only conventional rigid boards.

They are particularly useful when electrical connections must fit around mechanical components or within compact product housings.

Types of Rigid-Flex PCB Solutions

Different rigid-flex configurations support different levels of circuit complexity and mechanical flexibility.

Single-Layer Flexible Sections

Some rigid-flex designs use relatively simple flexible sections connected to rigid circuit areas.

These configurations may be suitable for applications with straightforward electrical routing and limited interconnection requirements.

The exact construction depends on the required conductor arrangement and the manufacturer’s available processes.

Multilayer Rigid-Flex PCBs

Multilayer rigid-flex boards contain multiple conductive layers that support more complex circuits.

They can accommodate additional signal routing, power distribution, and electrical connections within a limited footprint.

Because additional layers can increase thickness and stiffness, the stack-up must be planned carefully to meet both electrical and mechanical requirements.

High-Density Rigid-Flex Circuits

High-density designs support compact layouts, fine-pitch components, and closely spaced conductive traces.

These boards may be used in advanced communication equipment, portable electronics, medical instruments, and specialized industrial systems.

Manufacturing feasibility depends on trace dimensions, spacing, via structures, material properties, and alignment tolerances.

Controlled-Impedance Rigid-Flex PCBs

Some advanced circuits require specific impedance characteristics for high-speed signals or radio-frequency applications.

Controlled-impedance rigid-flex designs require careful consideration of conductor geometry, dielectric thickness, and material properties.

The proposed stack-up should be reviewed to ensure that the manufacturing process can support the required electrical performance.

Custom-Shaped Rigid-Flex Boards

Some products require unusual circuit outlines, multiple rigid sections, specialized connector positions, or flexible connections that follow a defined route.

Custom rigid-flex fabrication can accommodate these requirements when the design files clearly specify dimensions, mechanical clearances, layer arrangements, and bending conditions.

Applications of Rigid-Flex PCBs in Advanced Electronics

Rigid-flex circuit boards are used across industries that require compact, integrated, and reliable electronic assemblies.

Medical Devices

Medical electronics often contain sensors, displays, control circuits, and communication modules within compact enclosures.

Rigid-flex PCBs can help connect these elements while reducing the need for separate cables.

Potential applications include diagnostic instruments, patient monitoring equipment, imaging systems, and specialized medical devices.

Medical projects may require additional quality documentation, traceability, material controls, and validation procedures based on their intended use.

Aerospace and Aviation Systems

Aerospace electronics often operate within strict weight and space constraints.

Rigid-flex boards can support compact electronic assemblies while integrating connections between different circuit areas.

Applications with demanding environmental requirements may also need specialized materials, vibration evaluation, thermal testing, and appropriate qualification procedures.

Automotive Electronics

Modern vehicles contain electronic systems for sensing, navigation, lighting, driver information, and control functions.

Rigid-flex technology can help connect different electronic modules within compact assemblies.

Automotive applications may require designs that account for vibration, temperature variations, moisture exposure, and other operating conditions.

Consumer Electronics

Portable devices, cameras, wearable products, and compact electronic accessories may benefit from rigid-flex construction.

The technology can help manufacturers integrate components within small enclosures while reducing separate wiring connections.

Industrial Automation

Industrial equipment often contains control boards, sensors, communication interfaces, and monitoring systems.

Rigid-flex designs can connect these components in applications where space is limited or where a particular mechanical arrangement is required.

For equipment exposed to vibration or repeated movement, the flexible sections must be designed for the actual mechanical conditions.

Telecommunications Equipment

Communication devices and networking equipment may require dense circuit layouts and reliable connections between electronic modules.

Rigid-flex technology can help integrate these connections, while controlled-impedance design may be necessary for certain high-speed applications.

The Rigid-Flex PCB Manufacturing Process

Producing a reliable rigid-flex circuit requires coordinated design, material selection, fabrication, and inspection.

Step 1: Design and Engineering Review

Manufacturing begins with a review of the circuit layout, mechanical drawings, layer count, and electrical specifications.

The manufacturer evaluates board dimensions, component placement, connector locations, flexible regions, and the requirements of the rigid-to-flex transitions.

The review should also identify bend locations, expected movement, minimum bend radius, and any controlled-impedance requirements.

Step 2: Material Selection

Material selection influences flexibility, electrical performance, thermal stability, and long-term reliability.

Polyimide is commonly used for flexible circuit sections, while suitable rigid laminates are used for rigid portions.

Copper foil, bonding materials, adhesives, and protective layers must be selected according to the design requirements and manufacturing process.

Step 3: Stack-Up Design

The layer stack-up defines the arrangement of conductive layers, insulating materials, and bonding layers.

A carefully planned stack-up helps maintain the required electrical characteristics and mechanical behavior.

Designers must pay particular attention to the flexible regions because the number and arrangement of layers can influence bending performance.

Step 4: Circuit Pattern Formation

Conductive copper layers are processed to create the required traces, pads, and electrical pathways.

Accurate pattern formation is essential for maintaining conductor widths, spacing, and alignment.

Advanced designs may require tighter process controls to accommodate fine-pitch components and dense routing.

Step 5: Drilling and Electrical Interconnections

Where required, holes and interconnection structures are produced to connect different conductive layers.

Drilling and plating methods depend on the board construction, via requirements, and manufacturing capabilities.

The placement of vias and other features should account for the mechanical stresses that may affect flexible regions.

Step 6: Lamination and Bonding

The circuit layers are combined through controlled lamination and bonding processes.

These operations must maintain layer alignment and create a stable structure without compromising the properties of the flexible materials.

The manufacturing process should account for the different thermal and mechanical characteristics of the materials being combined.

Step 7: Protective Layer Application

Flexible sections commonly receive a coverlay that protects the copper traces and provides electrical insulation.

The coverlay must align with the circuit features while leaving required pads and connection areas exposed.

Surface finishes may also be applied to designated conductive areas according to the design requirements.

Step 8: Circuit Profiling

The finished circuit is cut or routed to its specified shape.

Accurate profiling ensures that mounting holes, rigid sections, flexible regions, and connector locations match the mechanical drawings.

Step 9: Inspection and Testing

The completed boards undergo appropriate quality checks.

These may include visual inspection, dimensional verification, electrical continuity testing, isolation testing, and additional examinations for critical features.

Depending on the application, manufacturers may also perform controlled-impedance measurements, cross-section analysis, or mechanical reliability tests.

The inspection plan should be agreed upon according to the design and the intended use of the finished product.

Important Design Considerations for Rigid-Flex Circuit Boards

Selecting the right manufacturing process is only part of achieving reliable results. The circuit design must also account for the interaction between electrical and mechanical requirements.

Bend Radius

The minimum bend radius determines how tightly a flexible section can bend without exceeding its mechanical limits.

The appropriate radius depends on the material stack-up, copper construction, number of layers, and whether bending occurs during installation or throughout normal operation.

Designers should clearly define the expected bending conditions before production.

Copper Trace Routing

Copper traces in flexible areas may experience mechanical stress during bending.

Trace routing, conductor geometry, copper thickness, and the location of critical features can influence durability.

Following manufacturer-specific design guidelines helps reduce the risk of cracking or other mechanical failures.

Rigid-to-Flex Transition Design

Transition areas should be designed to minimize concentrated stress.

The arrangement of layers, material boundaries, and conductive traces must be considered together.

Components and vias should be positioned carefully to avoid placing mechanically sensitive features in unsuitable flex regions.

Layer Count and Board Thickness

Additional layers can support more complex electrical designs, but they may also increase board thickness and reduce flexibility.

Designers should select a layer count that meets electrical requirements without introducing unnecessary mechanical complexity.

Thermal Management

Electronic components may generate heat during operation, affecting the surrounding circuit materials.

The design should account for component power dissipation, temperature limits, and the thermal behavior of the rigid and flexible sections.

Electrical Performance

High-speed and RF circuits may require controlled impedance, carefully planned return paths, and appropriate dielectric materials.

Electrical performance should be evaluated alongside mechanical requirements to ensure that the selected construction is suitable for the complete application.

Inspection and Validation

Testing should reflect the expected operating environment and the function of the circuit.

A board that bends only during installation has different mechanical requirements from one that experiences repeated movement.

Defining the acceptance criteria early helps the manufacturer select suitable inspection and validation methods.

Rigid-Flex PCB vs. Traditional Rigid PCB

Rigid and rigid-flex circuit boards serve different purposes, so the appropriate choice depends on the product design.

Structure: Traditional rigid PCBs maintain a fixed shape, while rigid-flex PCBs combine fixed sections with flexible circuit areas.

Space requirements: Rigid-flex technology may reduce the space needed for separate cables and connectors. Traditional rigid boards can be suitable when sufficient flat mounting space is available.

Assembly complexity: Rigid-flex boards can integrate multiple circuit areas into one assembly, while conventional designs may require separate boards and additional connections.

Manufacturing complexity: Standard rigid PCBs generally involve simpler material arrangements. Rigid-flex designs require additional planning for material transitions, bonding, and bending requirements.

Cost: Rigid-flex boards may have higher initial manufacturing costs. However, overall system costs may be reduced when the integrated design eliminates separate components or assembly operations.

Mechanical flexibility: Traditional rigid boards are designed to remain fixed during normal use, while rigid-flex boards include sections designed to accommodate specified bending conditions.

Businesses should compare manufacturing costs, product dimensions, reliability requirements, and assembly complexity before selecting a technology.

How to Choose the Right Rigid Flex PCB Manufacturer

Selecting a suitable manufacturing partner is important for achieving the required quality, production schedule, and electrical performance.

Consider the following factors before making a decision.

  • Technical capabilities: Confirm that the manufacturer supports the required layer count, materials, copper thickness, via structures, and board dimensions.
  • Rigid-flex experience: Ask about experience with similar circuit constructions and mechanical requirements.
  • Engineering support: Determine whether the manufacturer can review the stack-up, design files, and transition areas before production.
  • Quality control: Review the inspection procedures, electrical testing methods, and defect-management processes.
  • Material traceability: For demanding applications, confirm whether the required material documentation and traceability are available.
  • Production lead time: Request a project-specific schedule based on the actual design, quantity, and testing requirements.
  • Cost transparency: Review tooling, fabrication, inspection, and other applicable charges.
  • Communication: Choose a partner that can explain technical limitations and clarify manufacturing requirements before production begins.

A manufacturer should be able to evaluate the design against its actual production capabilities rather than simply accepting specifications without review.

Why Consider Fast Turn PCB for Advanced Circuit Designs?

Fast Turn PCB is a relevant option to evaluate when searching for PCB manufacturing solutions for advanced electronic applications. Before selecting Fast Turn PCB for a rigid-flex project, businesses should verify its current capabilities against the circuit’s technical specifications and production requirements.

Important questions include whether the required rigid-flex construction is supported, which materials and layer counts are available, what tolerances can be achieved, and which inspection and testing procedures are offered.

Providing complete fabrication files, a bill of materials where applicable, mechanical drawings, and clear acceptance criteria can help the manufacturer assess the project accurately.

Businesses should also clarify expected production lead times, component requirements, engineering support, and quality documentation before placing an order.

A careful evaluation helps determine whether the manufacturing solution is appropriate for the product’s complexity, performance requirements, and production schedule.

Conclusion

An expert rigid flex PCB manufacturer plays an important role in developing advanced circuit designs that combine compact construction with reliable electrical connections. Rigid-flex technology allows engineers to integrate rigid mounting areas and flexible circuit sections into a single assembly, helping reduce separate connections and improve product packaging.

Successful manufacturing depends on accurate stack-up design, suitable material selection, controlled rigid-to-flex transitions, precise circuit patterning, and appropriate inspection and testing. These considerations are especially important for complex applications in medical electronics, aerospace, automotive systems, industrial automation, and consumer devices.

Fast Turn PCB can be evaluated as a potential manufacturing partner by reviewing its available rigid-flex capabilities, technical support, quality procedures, and project-specific requirements. By selecting an appropriate manufacturing process and preparing the design carefully, businesses can develop circuit board assemblies that meet the demands of modern electronic products.

Chandler Smith outduels the field for dramatic Truck victory at Martinsville

Photo by John Knittel for SpeedwayMedia.com.

Chandler Smith came out on top amid a 12-lap dash to the finish to win the Black’s Tire 200 at Martinsville Speedway on Friday, October 30.

The 24-year-old Smith from Talking Rock, Georgia, led the final 12 of 200-scheduled laps in an event where he qualified in third place, notched a pair of third-place results through the event’s first two stage periods and contended towards the front for the event’s entirety. Amid a wave of cautions and late-race restarts throughout the final stage period, Smith had been a key figure to teammate Layne Riggs, whom Smith restarted behind through four restarts and enabled Riggs to battle for and with the lead to maintain his championship hopes. 

Following Riggs’ dominant run, Smith then restarted alongside Riggs for the event’s final restart with 12 laps remaining. With a strong launch from the outside lane, Smith managed to motor ahead of Riggs and the field. From there, Smith fended off Ben Rhodes and Riggs to notch his first NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series victory in Ridgeway, Virginia, and win in his penultimate event with Front Row Motorsports.

With on-track qualifying determining the starting lineup on Friday, Tristan McKee notched his first Truck career pole position with a pole-winning lap of 96.864 mph in 19.549 seconds. Layne Riggs qualified in second place with a lap of 96.775 mph in 19.567 seconds.

Prior to the event, the following names, including Gavan Boschele, Brenden Queen, and Frankie Muniz, dropped to the rear of the field due to unapproved adjustments that were made to their respective entries. Jake Garcia also dropped to the rear of the field in a backup truck after he wrecked his primary truck during practice earlier on Friday.

When the green flag waved and the event commenced, pole-sitter Tristan McKee and Layne Riggs dueled for the lead through the first two turns until Riggs, who started on the outside lane, motored his No. 34 BKB Bare Knuckle Boxing Ford F-150 entry ahead of McKee’s No. 77 Zeigler Chevrolet Silverado RST entry through the backstretch. This allowed Riggs to transition in front of McKee to the preferred inside lane prior to entering Turns 3 and 4. With the strong move working to his favor early, Riggs led the first lap.

Over the next four laps, Riggs maintained a steady lead over McKee, Ben Rhodes, Chandler Smith and Ty Majeski, respectively, while points leader Kaden Honeycutt trailed in sixth place. As Christian Eckes, Tyler Ankrum, Giovanni Ruggiero and Sammy Smith followed suit in the top-10 mark, respectively, Riggs led by seven-tenths of a second at the Lap 10 mark.

Just past the lap 15 mark, Riggs grew his advantage up to nine-tenths of a second over McKee. As Riggs reeled in the tail end of the field, his advantage over McKee was up by more than a second at the Lap 20 mark before it increased by more than two seconds through the Lap 25 mark. By then, McKee retained the runner-up spot over Rhodes, Smith and Majeski while Honeycutt continued to race in sixth place in his No. 11 Safelite Toyota Tundra TRD Pro entry and in front of Eckes, Ankrum, Ruggiero and Landen Lewis, respectively.

On Lap 36, the event’s first caution flew when Eckes, who was battling Honeycutt for sixth place, made contact with Honeycutt entering the first turn. The contact caused Honeycutt to tap and send the lapped competitor of Frankie Muniz, the latter of whom Honeycutt was attempting to go beneath, for a spin towards the first two turn’s outside wall. At the time of caution, Riggs was leading by more than three seconds over McKee. During the event’s first caution period, some led by Sammy Smith and including Daniel Hemric, Tanner Gray, Conner Jones, Grant Enfinger, Cole Butcher, Jake Garcia and Corey LaJoie pitted while the rest led by Riggs remained on the track.

The event’s next restart on Lap 44 featured the leader Riggs motoring ahead of McKee and the field prior to entering the first two turns. With the field filing suit amid two lanes, McKee fended off Rhodes, Smith and Majeski for the runner-up spot as Riggs led the next lap. Meanwhile, Honeycutt pursued Eckes for sixth place and both Smith and Rhodes battled for third place as Riggs started to motor away from the field.

When the first stage period concluded on Lap 50, Riggs cruised to his 12th Truck stage victory of the 2026 season. McKee followed suit in second ahead of Smith, Rhodes and Majeski while Eckes, Honeycutt, Ankrum, Andres Perez De Lara and Ruggiero were scored in the top 10, respectively. With eight of 10 Chase contenders (Riggs, Smith, Rhodes, Majeski, Eckes, Honeycutt, Ankrum and Ruggiero) notching the event’s first round of stage points, the remaining Chasers that include Hemric and Enfinger were mired in 13th and 19th, respectively. By then, 26 of 36 starters were scored on the lead lap.

Under the event’s first stage break period, some, including Stewart Friesen, Brenden Queen, Tyler Reif, Kasey Kleyn and Tyler Tomassi, pitted their respective entries while the rest, led by Riggs, opted to remain on the track. 

The second stage period started on Lap 58 as Riggs and McKee occupied the front row. At the start, Riggs, who briefly stepped out of the throttle to receive a shove from teammate Chandler Smith for a strong launch, retained the lead after muscling away from McKee and the field through the first two turns. As Riggs led the next lap and started to motor away from the field, McKee fended off Smith and Rhodes for the runner-up spot before Rhodes nudged, dueled and overtook Smith for third place on Lap 60. Behind, Honeycutt and Eckes dueled for sixth place in front of Perez De Lara, Ankrum and a bevy of competitors while Majeski retained fifth place. With Honeycutt overtaking Eckes for sixth place on Lap 62, Riggs proceeded to lead by more than a second at the Lap 65 mark. 

Through the Lap 70 mark, Riggs continued to lead by more than a second over McKee while Rhodes, who was dealing with braking issues, maintained third place over Smith and Majeski. Riggs proceeded to lead by more than one-and-a-half seconds at the Lap 75 mark before the latter’s advantage increased up by more than two seconds on Lap 80. By then, Honeycutt trailed Riggs by six seconds in sixth place. Honeycutt continued to trail Riggs by more than six seconds in sixth place by Lap 90 as Riggs, who was lapping competitors, led by more than two seconds, with McKee, Rhodes, Smith and Majeski pursuing in the top five, respectively.

When the second stage period concluded on Lap 100, the event’s halfway mark, Riggs sped his way to his 13th Truck stage victory of the 2026 season and second of Friday night’s event. McKee trailed by in the runner-up spot by more than two seconds and the latter was followed by Smith, Rhodes and Majeski while Honeycutt, Eckes, Ankrum, Perez De Lara and Garcia were scored in the top 10, respectively. With seven of 10 Chasers (Riggs, Smith, Rhodes, Majeski, Honeycutt, Majeski, Eckes and Ankrum) notching the event’s second round of stage points, the remaining Chasers that include Hemric, Ruggiero and Enfinger were scored in 11th, 14th and 15th, respectively. By then, 23 of 36 starters were scored on the lead lap.

The event’s second stage break period was extensive due to the on-track safety workers cleaning fluid that came out of Conner Jones’ entry when Jones pitted and took his entry behind the wall when it was smoking during the closing laps of the first stage period. When pit road became accessible for the field, nearly the entire field led by Riggs pitted while a handful that included Sammy Smith, Friesen and Timmy Hill remained on the track. Following the pit stops, Riggs exited pit road first while McKee, Cole Butcher, Honeycutt, Rhodes, Chandler Smith, Eckes, Perez De Lara, Ankrum and Majeski followed suit, respectively. Smith and Hill eventually pitted while Friesen, who last pitted during the first stage’s break period, remained on the track with the lead. 

With 86 laps remaining, the final stage period commenced as Friesen and Riggs occupied the front row. At the start, the latter two dueled for a full lap before Riggs, who restarted on the outside lane and had fresher tire than Friesen, managed to lead the next lap. Riggs then cleared Friesen through the fronstretch and started to motor away while Honeycutt was battling Butcher and Rhodes for fourth place. 

The caution then returned with 83 laps remaining when Hemric tapped and sent Tyler Reif for a spin entering the third turn. Reif’s incident ignited a chain reaction as Kaulig Racing’s Justin Haley, Brenden Queen and Corey LaJoie collided against one another through the third turn while a handful of competitors, including Landen Lewis and Kasey Kleyn, both of whom made contact, hopped the curb to avoid Reif’s spin. Amid the carnage, Monty Tipton sustained the heaviest damage to the front of his entry and Queen sustained heavy left-front damage while Tanner Gray also sustained rear end damage.

The latest incident placed the event in a red flag period for seven minutes and 32 seconds to have the carnage and spilled fluid cleared and cleaned. Once the red flag lifted and the field proceeded under a cautious pace, some including Queen, Lewis, LaJoie, Garcia, Carson Ferguson, Gavin Boschele, Spencer Boyd, Josh Reaume, Frankie Muniz, Tyler Tomassi, Justin Carroll and Haley pitted while the rest led by Riggs remained on the track. By then, Haley joined Sammy Smith and Conner Jones behind the wall.

When the event restarted with 75 laps remaining, Riggs and McKee fiercely dueled for the lead for a full lap as McKee, who restarted on the outside lane, managed to motor ahead of Riggs and lead the next lap. As McKee led through the backstretch, Honeycutt launched his attack on Riggs for the runner-up spot. Amid a brief charge through the frontstretch, Riggs motored ahead and fended off Honeycutt for the runner-up spot through the first two turns for the next lap. Meanwhile, McKee continued to lead before the caution returned with 71 laps remaining when Kasey Kleyn spun through the first two turns after he got hit by Landen Lewis.

For the next restart with 65 laps remaining, McKee fended off Riggs and Honeycutt to retain the lead for a full lap for a second consecutive restart. Behind, Riggs managed to motor ahead of Honeycutt to retain the runner-up spot while Chandler Smith, Riggs’ teammate, fiercely battled for third place in front of Rhodes. Seconds later, the caution returned when a multi-truck accident that included Butcher, Hemric, William Sawalich, Friesen, Timmy Hill and Lewis all wrecked through the first two turns, though all competitors managed to quickly straighten their respective entries. 

The next restart with 54 laps remaining only lasted half a lap when Timmy Hill got sideways after he got bumped by Tanner Gray entering the backstretch. Gray’s contact caused Hill to snap back to the right and in front of Butcher while Friesen was T-boned in the rear by Justin Carroll as Carson Furgeson, Boschele and Josh Reaume were also swept in the carnage. At the moment of caution, McKee retained the lead over Riggs, Honeycutt, Smith and Rhodes, respectively, as the event was placed in a second red flag period, this latest one being for two minutes and 10 seconds.

When the red flag lifted and the field proceeded under caution, the event’s next restart under green with 46 laps remaining featured Riggs, who notched a stronger launch from the outside lane with teammate Smith behind, dueling McKee for half a lap. Riggs then managed to drive his Ford hard entering the third turn, clear McKee and lead the next lap. As Riggs led, McKee retained second place while Honeycutt was mired in fourth place behind Smith. Smith then started to intimidate and bump McKee for the runner-up spot before the latter two dueled for the spot with 43 laps remaining. For the next lap, Majeski overtook Honeycutt for fourth place as Rhodes followed suit for fifth place. With Honeycutt mired in sixth place, Smith and McKee continued to bump and battle for the runner-up spot as Riggs, who led by more than a second, was leading with 40 laps remaining.

Following a caution that flew with 36 laps remaining due to Kris Wright bumping and sending Butcher into Kleyn for a spin through the first two turns, the next restart with 30 laps remaining featured Riggs, who was pushed by Smith from the inside lane, clearing McKee through the first two turns. As Riggs led the next lap, teammate Smith battled McKee for the runner-up spot in front of Rhodes and Majeski while Perez De Lara battled and overtook Honeycutt for sixth place. As Smith and McKee continued to fiercely battle for the runner-up spot in front of Rhodes and Majeski, Riggs stretched his late lead by more than one-and-a-half seconds with 25 laps remaining. Meanwhile, Honeycutt was strapped in seventh place in front of Ankrum and teammate Ruggiero while Riggs stabilized his lead with 20 laps remaining.

Seconds later, with 20 laps remaining, the caution returned due to Reif and Furgeson wrecking on the backstretch. Reif would then be penalized two laps for intentionally wrecking Furgeson. This set the event for a 12-lap shootout as Front Row Motorsports’ Riggs and Smith occupied the front row in front of McKee, Rhodes, Majeski and Honeycutt.

For the start of the 12-lap shootout, Smith gained a strong start from the outside lane as both he and teammate Riggs dueled for the lead through the first two turns until Smith motored his No. 38 QuickTie Ford F-150 entry ahead and in front of Riggs through the backstretch. As Smith cycled back to the frontstretch to lead the next lap, Riggs nearly got loose and briefly lost pace, which allowed Rhodes to overtake Riggs for the runner-up spot. Then entering the first turn, McKee made contact with Honeycutt while battling for fourth place. The contact caused Honeycutt to go wide as he dropped out of the top-10 mark. With Honeycutt mired within the top-15 mark and Riggs settling in third place, Smith led by three-tenths of a second with 10 laps remaining.

As the laps dwindled, Smith maintained a late, steady advantage that stood at three-tenths of a second over Rhodes while Riggs trailed by six-tenths of a second in third place. As Riggs tried but was unable to reel in his deficit, Honeycutt was mired in 14th place in front of Honeycutt while Smith led by four-tenths of a second with five laps remaining. Smith’s advantage would then slightly grow up to half a second over the next four laps.

When the white flag waved and the final lap started, Smith remained in the lead by half a second over Rhodes and a second over Riggs. With the latter two unable to reel in their deficits, Smith smoothly cycled around Martinsville for a final time before he returned to the frontstretch victorious and with the checkered flag by half a second over Rhodes.

With the victory, Chandler Smith, who previously won at North Wilkesboro Speedway in mid-July, notched his third NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series win of the 2026 season, the 10th of his career and his first at Martinsville Speedway. Smith’s Martinsville victory was also the 10th of this season for Ford and the ninth for Front Row Motorsports.

No. 38
Photo by John Knittel for SpeedwayMedia.com.

Smith’s Martinsville victory was a bittersweet one as he will make his final start with Front Row Motorsports for next weekend’s finale at Homestead-Miami Speedway before he goes full-time racing with Richard Childress Racing in the O’Reilly Auto Parts Series division in 2027. Despite being mathematically eliminated from the championship battle, Smith retains third place in the driver’s standings by 25 points over Ty Majeski.

“All praise and glory to the Lord,” Smith said on FS1. “I mean, we’ve been through a very rough patch since the Chase started and we’ve kept our heads down. We stayed faithful. Man, I’m truly humbled right now for this experience. Martinsville has been one on my bucket list that went for quite a while and I struggled here for a while. Then when I went to Joe Gibbs Racing, we had some really fast cars there. Then came here and had some really fast trucks and tonight, the car just felt exactly how they needed it to be. We got one more race to do with [Front Row Motorsports]. It’s very bittersweet, but man, I’m very happy that we can deliver a clock to [team owner] Bob Jenkins.”

Amid Smith’s celebration, Layne Riggs, who led a race-high 156 laps and swept the event’s first two stages, capped off his dominant run in third place while Kaden Honeycutt ended up in 14th place. Prior to Martinsville, Honeycutt had a 43-point advantage over Riggs. After Martinsville, the former leads the latter by 20 points looking ahead to next weekend’s season-finale event at Homestead, where both competitors control their own destiny to contend for their first championship.

“[I was] Just too free to fire off on restarts when the rubber got picked up…just could not get going on that last restart,” Riggs said. “I feel Iike I prepped my tires, did the best I could. I just didn’t have the clean air like those other runs. We’re still in the [championship] shot. We gained more than we were down. I’m happy about that. I wanted a [Martinsville] clock so bad. I wanted to get my own grandfather clock. I wasn’t able to do it, but the way it looks, I think it’s gonna be either me or [Honeycutt] wins at Homestead. It looks like a winner take all like usual, but it’s just only two of us.”

“I got bailed out there, especially with Chandler [Smith] winning that race,” Honeycutt said. “I’m really surprised he went and did that. Twenty points [with the championship lead], but definitely not comfortable in the slightest bit. We got to go win Homestead next week and just focus on winning. I think that’s all we can do…Not concerned for next week. We’re not done yet. We got one more [race] to go and if we can go win out on top, it’d be much nicer.”

Ty Majeski and Tristan McKee finished in the top five while Andres Perez De Lara, Tyler Ankrum, Giovanni Ruggiero, William Sawalich and Christian Eckes completed the top 10 in the final running order at Martinsville.

The penultimate Craftsman Truck Series Chase event of the 2026 season at Martinsville saw seven lead changes among four leaders, and nine cautions over 67 laps. In addition, 22 of 36 starters finished on the lead lap.

Results:

  1. Chandler Smith, 12 laps led
  2. Ben Rhodes
  3. Layne Riggs, 156 laps led, Stages 1 & 2 winner
  4. Ty Majeski
  5. Tristan McKee, 29 laps led
  6. Andres Perez De Lara
  7. Tyler Ankrum
  8. Giovanni Ruggiero
  9. William Sawalich
  10. Christian Eckes
  11. Grant Enfinger
  12. Brenden Queen
  13. Jake Garcia
  14. Kaden Honeycutt
  15. Daniel Hemric
  16. Kasey Kleyn
  17. Mini Tyrrell
  18. Tanner Gray
  19. Landen Lewis
  20. Corey LaJoie
  21. Kris Wright
  22. Cole Butcher
  23. Spencer Boyd, one lap down
  24. Gavan Goschele, two laps down
  25. Frankie Muniq, two laps down
  26. Josh Reaume, two laps down
  27. Tyler Reif, two laps down
  28. Tyler Tomassi, four laps down
  29. Carson Ferguson – OUT, Accident
  30. Stewart Friesen – OUT, Accident, three laps led
  31. Timmy Hill – OUT, Accident
  32. Justin Carroll – OUT, Accident
  33. Sammy Smith – OUT, Suspension
  34. Justin Haley – OUT, Accident
  35. Monty Tipton – OUT, Accident
  36. Conner Jones – OUT, Rear Gear

*Bold indicates Chase Drivers

After the sixth Chase event of the 2026 NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series season, Kaden Honeycutt continues to lead the standings by only 20 points over Layne Riggs. The rest of the 10-Truck Chase field is displayed below, with the remaining Chasers starting with third-place Chandler Smith being mathematically eliminated from championship contention.

Chase Standings:

  1. Kaden Honeycutt
  2. Layne Riggs -20
  3. Chandler Smith -103
  4. Ty Majeski -128
  5. Christian Eckes -140
  6. Giovanni Ruggiero -179
  7. Ben Rhodes -186
  8. Daniel Hemric -204
  9. Tyler Ankrum -210
  10. Grant Enfinger -225

The 2026 NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series season is scheduled to conclude next Friday, November 6, at Homestead-Miami Speedway in Homestead, Florida, where a champion will be crowned. The finale’s broadcast time is slated to commence at 7:30 p.m. ET on FS1, NASCAR Racing Network, and SiriusXM.

Chandler Smith Leads 1-2-3-4 Ford Sweep at Martinsville

Ford Racing Notes and Quotes
NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series
Black’s Tire 200 — Martinsville Speedway
Friday, October 30, 2026

CHANDLER SMITH LEADS 1-2-3-4 FORD SWEEP AT MARTINSVILLE

  • Chandler Smith led a Ford sweep of the top four positions as he won tonight’s race at Martinsville Speedway. Ben Rhodes was second, Layne Riggs third and Ty Majeski fourth.
  • The win in Smith’s third of the season and 10th of his career.
  • Ford has 11 wins this season which is one away from matching its all-time best.
  • Ford’s other NCTS wins this year have been by Layne Riggs (7) and Jake Garcia (1).
  • Overall, Ford has won 140 series races.

Ford Finishing Results

1st – Chandler Smith

2nd – Ben Rhodes

3rd – Layne Riggs

4th – Ty Majeski

13th – Jake Garcia

22nd – Cole Butcher

25th – Frankie Muniz

26th – Josh Reaume

35th – Monty Tipton

CHANDLER SMITH, No. 38 QuickTie/Cole Swindell Ford F-150 – VICTORY LANE INTERVIEW – “God is good. The faith has been tested, especially since the start of the Chase and it’s been literally every single week something, but our faith never wavered though. I’m just very grateful and I’m very humbled for tonight. I just know that that’s from the Lord. Everybody on this No. 38 QuickTie Products Ford F-150, we had a solid truck tonight, especially when it counted. We’ve got one more race left and we’ll try to end that with a band with these Front Row Motorsports fellas.” WHEN THE LAST CAUTION CAME OUT, WHAT WERE YOUR THOUGHTS? “I just wanted to execute, be clean, make sure I don’t screw the 34 up – just race clean and try to get the win. The Lord delivered it and I’m just grateful. I’m humbled to be the vessel tonight.” WHAT ABOUT NEXT WEEK AT HOMESTEAD AND ENDING THE SEASON STRONG? “Hopefully, we can get one more win sticker at Homestead to top it off.”

LAYNE RIGGS, No. 34 BKB Bare Knuckle Boxing Ford F-150 – CAN YOU TALK ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED ON THE FINAL RESTART WITH CHANDLER GETTING OUT FRONT? “I felt better on the top on restarts all night long, taking the lead back from the 77. I just felt like I was just too loose to fire off on restarts. When you have a good balance on the long run, you have to be too free on the initial runs, so I wanted to take the top. My team kind of differed against that. They didn’t want me to take the top because then you put the control of your race in the guy’s hands on the inside of you. He can use you up. Who knows if he would have played nice or not. Congrats to Chandler on the win. It’s been a little while for those guys, but those bonus points really would have been nice, and even more than that I wanted a grandfather clock really, really bad. We led so many laps. I’m just disappointed. It’s always a shoulda, woulda, coulda, but we had a really fast truck. Thank you to Bare Knuckle Boxing, Ford Racing, everybody at Front Row Motorsports. They gave me a really fast truck. You couldn’t ask for much more. I just wish that we were a little bit more prone to being better on short runs. We worked on our long run. Obviously, every time I’d get out front I’d just have a massive lead. I wish I had a little more air in my tires there those last few restarts.” YOU ARE 20 POINTS OUT GOING TO HOMESTEAD. HOW DO YOU FEEL? “All positivity we’re gonna go win it. With this format having 20 bonus points, it’s pretty much a winner take all again, in my opinion. Instead of having four, it’s two this time, so we’re gonna go win. That’s all I can go do. Go win. At least go match him in stage points. We can’t have a bad qualifying effort or have something bad on pit road. We’ve just got to go there and execute. As you saw tonight, he’s not as dominant as some people think. He had a little issue that kind of helped us out as well, but it would have been nice to win for me. We would have been in the plus right now.”

BEN RHODES, No. 99 Bommarito Ford F-150 – “A lot of second places at Martinsville, but, honestly, I’ll take it. Martinsville is a tough racetrack and our ThorSport Racing crew always brings me a great Bommarito F-150. We started off practice good and qualifying went OK, but we just hovered around that fourth to fifth place spot all day long, just playing it easy. Thankfully, there at the end we got a good restart. I thought we had something maybe for Chandler, but as the laps were dragging on he was starting to inch away from me. I was doing all I could to stay with him and he was giving it all he had to stay away from us. If we were able to get to him any sooner, I was afraid that the pack would have got to us, so I was trying to play it careful, but it was too little, too late.” HOW REAL WERE YOUR BRAKE ISSUES? “The pedal was going to the floor. It was too hot, too much tape on the grille. We got that off on the one and only pit stop today, so I’m thankful that our pit crew did a good job and I was able to cool our brakes down.”

TY MAJESKI, No. 88 Serta/Menards Ford F-150 – “We were just a little bit off tonight. We were a fourth to sixth place truck depending on how the restart shook out. It was a solid run with our Menards Ford F-150, but just came up a little bit short tonight.” ANY BRAKE ISSUES? “A little bit here and there, but nothing out of the ordinary. The pedal gets a little bit soft under yellow. You just kind of had to pump it to get it back, but nothing out of the ordinary.” AFTER THE BREWERS WON THE WORLD SERIES AND PACKERS WON LAST NIGHT. WERE YOU TRYING TO MAKE IT THREE STRAIGHT FOR WISCONSIN? “That would have been nice, for sure. It’s a good time to be a Wisconsin sports fan. I wish we could have got it tonight. This race is on my bucket list, so hopefully one day.”

TOYOTA RACING – NCTS Martinsville Post-Race Report – 10.30.26

RUGGIERO AND SAWALICH NOTCH TOP-10 FINISHES TO LEAD TOYOTA AT MARTINSVILLE
Toyota Development Driver Kaden Honeycutt Takes 20-Point Lead in Season Finale Next Friday

MARTINSVILLE, Va. (October 30, 2026) – Gio Ruggiero (eighth) and William Sawalich (ninth) both recorded top 10 finishes for TRICON Garage to lead Toyota in Friday night’s NASCAR Truck Series race at Martinsville Speedway.

Toyota development driver Kaden Honeycutt got loose on a late-race restart, lost several spots and finished 14th. He still leads Layne Riggs by 20 points heading into the season finale Friday night at Homestead-Miami Speedway. Honeycutt and Riggs are the only drivers mathematically eligible for the title, and they will settle it under the lights in South Florida to decide the 2026 Truck Series champion.

TOYOTA RACING Post-Race Recap
NASCAR CRAFTSMAN Truck Series (NCTS)
Martinsville Speedway
Race 24 of 25 – 105.2 Miles, 200 Laps

TOYOTA FINISHING POSITIONS

1st, Chandler Smith*

2nd, Ben Rhodes*

3rd, Layne Riggs*

4th, Ty Majeski*

5th, Tristan McKee*

8th, GIO RUGGIERO

9th, WILLIAM SAWALICH

14th, KADEN HONEYCUTT

16th, KASEY KLEYN

18th, TANNER GRAY

24th, GAVAN BOSCHELE

30th, STEWART FRIESEN

31st, TIMMY HILL

32nd, JUSTIN CARROLL

*non-Toyota driver

TOYOTA QUOTES

KADEN HONEYCUTT, No. 11 Safelite Toyota Tundra TRD Pro, TRICON Garage

Finishing Position: 14th

What did you ask Tristan McKee after the race?

“I had nothing against him. I just wanted to ask him if the 88 (Ty Majeski) hit him or not. When I looked in my mirror and I saw he was sideways, I didn’t know if he got free in or if he got run over, I just wanted to see what he said. (after seeing the replay) He was just trying to get Majeski room and I didn’t get the call that we were three wide until too late. It’s a sucky deal, but I got bailed out there especially with Chandler (Smith) winning that race, I’m really surprised he did that. Yeah, 20 points, but definitely not comfortable in Homestead next week. Just focusing on winning and that’s all we can do. It was a struggle today, I felt like we were good on the long run, just couldn’t fire off and then just made an adjustment there and just went too far. I got all the confidence in the world going to Homestead. Scott (Zipadelli, crew chief) and this whole team loves Homestead, so not concerned for next week. Thanks to Safelite, Mobil 1, TOYOTA RACING, TRICON Garage for all the effort. We aren’t done yet, but we’ve got one more to go. If we can go out on top it would be much nicer.”

About Toyota

Toyota (NYSE:TM) has been a part of the cultural fabric in North America for nearly 70 years, and is committed to advancing sustainable, next-generation mobility through our Toyota and Lexus brands, plus our more than 1,800 dealerships.

Toyota directly employs nearly 64,000 people in North America who have contributed to the design, engineering, and assembly of over 50 million cars and trucks at our 14 manufacturing plants. In 2025, Toyota’s plant in North Carolina began to assemble automotive batteries for electrified vehicles.

For more information about Toyota, visit www.ToyotaNewsroom.com.

Carson Kvapil snatches third O’Reilly career pole at Martinsville

Photo by John Knittel for SpeedwayMedia.com.

Carson Kvapil made a late capitalization to win the pole position for the National Debt Relief 250 at Martinsville Speedway on Friday, October 30.

The event’s starting lineup was determined through an on-track qualifying session that consisted of a single-car, two-lap qualifying format. During the session, each of the 38 competitors vying for 38 starting spots cycled around Martinsville twice to post the fastest lap amongst one another. The competitor who posted the fastest lap earned pole position.

During the session, Kvapil, who was the fourth-fastest competitor during practice earlier on Friday, utilized his two-lap session to clock in a pole-winning lap at 95.371 mph in 19.855 seconds, which was enough for the Mooresville, North Carolina, native to achieve the top-starting spot for the penultimate event of the 2026 NASCAR O’Reilly Auto Parts Series season.

With the pole, Kvapil notched his third career pole position in the O’Reilly Auto Parts Series division and first at Martinsville Speedway, a track in which Kvapil notched the prestigious ValleyStar Credit Union 300 at in 2024. Kvapil, who also recorded the 10th O’Reilly pole of 2026 for JR Motorsports, is currently ranked in fifth place in the 2026 driver’s standings and he trails points leader Jesse Love by 59 points as he has two-scheduled events remaining to reel in from his deficit and contend for his first O’Reilly championship for next weekend’s finale at Homestead-Miami Speedway.

Kvapil will share the front row with teammate Rajah Caruth, the latter of whom posted his fastest lap at 95.141 mph in 19.903 seconds. Teammate Justin Allgaier along with Parker Retzlaff and William Sawalich will start in the top five, respectively. Chase contenders Sammy Smith, Sheldon Creed, Jesse Love, Corey Day and Taylor Gray complete the top-10 starting grid, respectively.

With nine Chasers (Kvapil, Caruth, Allgaier, Retzlaff, Smith, Creed, Love, Day and Gray) starting in the top 10, the remaining Chasers that include Brandon Jones, Sam Mayer and Austin Hill will start 12th, 14th and 21st, respectively.

With 38 competitors vying for 38 starting spots, all made the main event.

Martinsville – Starting Lineup:

  1. Carson Kvapil, 95.371 mph, 19.855 seconds
  2. Rajah Caruth, 95.141 mph, 19.903 seconds
  3. Justin Allgaier, 94.960 mph, 19.941 seconds
  4. Parker Retzlaff, 94.960 mph, 19.941 seconds
  5. William Sawalich, 94.865 mph, 19.961 seconds
  6. Sammy Smith, 94.600 mph, 20.017 seconds
  7. Sheldon Creed, 94.538 mph, 20.030 seconds
  8. Jesse Love, 94.510 mph, 20.036 seconds
  9. Corey Day, 94.463 mph, 20.046 seconds
  10. Taylor Gray, 94.420 mph, 20.055 seconds
  11. Anthony Alfredo, 94.392 mph, 20.061 seconds
  12. Brandon Jones, 94.322 mph, 20.076 seconds
  13. Brent Crews, 94.111 mph, 20.121 seconds
  14. Sam Mayer, 94.106 mph, 20.122 seconds
  15. Dean Thompson, 93.975 mph, 20.150 seconds
  16. Blaine Perkins, 93.687 mph, 20.212 seconds
  17. Harrison Burton, 93.594 mph, 20.232 seconds
  18. Jeb Burton, 93.590 mph, 20.233 seconds
  19. Ryan Sieg, 93.497 mph, 20.253 seconds
  20. Jeremy Clements, 93.497 mph, 20.253 seconds
  21. Austin Hill, 93.396 mph, 20.275 seconds
  22. Kyle Sieg, 93.047 mph, 20.351 seconds
  23. Alex Labbe, 93.024 mph, 20.356 seconds
  24. Patrick Emerling, 92.705 mph, 20.426 seconds
  25. Brennan Poole, 92.637 mph, 20.441 seconds
  26. Patrick Staropoli, 92.637 mph, 20.441 seconds
  27. Carson Ware, 92.619 mph, 20.445 seconds
  28. Dawson Cram, 92.606 mph, 20.448 seconds
  29. Ryan Ellis, 92.565 mph, 20.457 seconds
  30. Justin Carroll, 92.551 mph, 20.460 seconds
  31. Mason Maggio, 92.511 mph, 29.469 seconds
  32. Lavar Scott, 92.384 mph, 20.497 seconds
  33. Joey Gase, 92.312 mph, 20.513 seconds
  34. Daniel Dye, 92.276 mph, 20.521 seconds
  35. Garrett Smithley, 91.740 mph, 20.641 seconds
  36. Josh Bilicki, 91.598 mph, 20.673 seconds
  37. Lee Pulliam, 91.249 mph, 20.752 seconds
  38. Baltazar Leguizamon, 89.736 mph, 21.102 seconds

*Bold indicates Chase Drivers

The 2026 National Debt Relief 250 at Martinsville Speedway is scheduled to occur on Saturday, October 31, at 4 p.m. ET on the CW Network, MRN Radio and SiriusXM.