Home Blog Page 39

How Choosing an Extended Warranty Truck Can Safeguard Your Investment

Investing in a commercial truck is a significant financial commitment that requires careful planning and management. The complexities of maintaining a fleet are vast, from managing the Telematics Control Unit (TCU) to ensuring compliance with the Automotive Cybersecurity Framework. As these vehicles are central to business operations, protecting your investment becomes crucial. This article explores how selecting an Extended Warranty Truck can provide vital protection for your fleet and ensure long-term profitability. We will delve into how warranties mitigate risks, considerations for choosing the right warranty, and how they serve as a strategic safeguard against unforeseen expenses.

Choosing an Extended Warranty Truck for Maximum Protection

Securing an Extended Warranty Truck offers comprehensive protection against mechanical failures and costly repairs. For example, incorporating Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS) in modern trucks can lead to complex and expensive repairs if components fail. A warranty can cover these costs, ensuring your budget remains intact. According to industry data, over 30% of fleet owners have experienced unexpected repair costs exceeding $5,000 annually. Thus, an extended warranty acts as a safety net, absorbing substantial expenses and minimizing financial strain.

Moreover, warranties often include coverage for Aftermarket Parts Compliance, which can prevent costly penalties for non-compliance with regulatory standards. As regulations tighten, particularly around Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting, having a warranty that accounts for these elements becomes essential for maintaining operational efficiency and compliance.

FleetOwner Magazine and Trucking Info are excellent resources for further insights into fleet management and warranty benefits.

Safeguarding Your Truck Investment with the Right Warranty

Choosing the right warranty involves understanding your fleet’s specific needs, including the Vehicle Lifecycle Management (VLM) process. During a truck’s lifecycle, components such as the Emission Control System (ECS) may require frequent attention. An extended warranty can cover these parts, ensuring they are maintained without additional financial burden. This protection extends the vehicle’s lifespan and enhances resale value.

Additionally, integrating Fleet Management Software (FMS) with warranty services can provide real-time data on vehicle performance, helping identify potential issues before they lead to costly replacements. This proactive approach not only safeguards your investment but also optimizes operational efficiency.

For businesses, warranties that include a Warranty Management System (WMS) offer streamlined processes for claims and repairs, reducing downtime and maintaining productivity. This strategic alignment between warranty services and fleet management practices is key to sustaining long-term profitability.

Key Considerations for Selecting a Truck Extended Warranty

When selecting an extended warranty, consider factors such as coverage limits, terms, and the inclusion of Digital Twin Technology in Automotive solutions. This technology enables predictive maintenance, reducing the likelihood of unexpected failures. Evaluate the warranty provider’s reputation, customer service, and track record in handling claims efficiently.

Furthermore, ensure the warranty covers crucial systems like the Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Communication network, essential for modern fleets. This coverage is particularly vital as autonomous vehicle testing protocols advance, requiring sophisticated communication systems that are expensive to repair or replace.

Finally, a thorough Regulatory Compliance Assessment (RCA) should be part of the decision-making process. This ensures that your warranty aligns with current and future regulatory requirements, protecting against potential legal challenges.

Extended Warranties as a Strategic Investment Safeguard

Extended warranties serve as a strategic safeguard by providing financial predictability and enhancing operational resilience. As trucks age, the risk of component failure increases, making warranties an invaluable asset for long-term cost management. By covering unexpected repairs and maintenance, warranties allow businesses to allocate funds more effectively, focusing on growth and innovation rather than emergency expenses.

Incorporating Collision Repair Estimation Software with your warranty can further streamline the repair process, ensuring accurate cost assessments and timely repairs. This integration supports a seamless operation, minimizing disruption to business activities.

Conclusion

Choosing an extended warranty for your trucks is a strategic decision that protects your investment and ensures operational continuity. By covering unexpected costs and facilitating compliance with evolving regulations, warranties enable businesses to maintain financial stability and focus on core activities. For fleet operators, this protection translates into sustained growth and competitive advantage in the dynamic automotive industry.

Why Professional Trailer Manufacturer, Hillsboro Industries Prioritizes Innovative Design in Trailer Solutions

In the competitive world of trailer manufacturing, innovation is not just beneficial, it’s a necessity. For professional trailer manufacturer, Hillsboro Industries, prioritizing innovative design in their trailer solutions is a fundamental business strategy. This focus not only distinguishes them in the market but also addresses the evolving needs of customers who demand efficiency, safety, and durability. This article delves into why Hillsboro Industries places such a premium on innovative design and how it enhances their offerings in the realm of Business, Automobiles, and Vehicles.

Innovative Design in Hillsboro Industries Trailer Solutions

Hillsboro Industries leverages advanced design principles to create trailers that stand out in terms of functionality and aesthetics. Their design process integrates cutting-edge techniques like Telematics Control Unit (TCU) integration, which allows for real-time data monitoring and improved fleet management. This focus on innovation is not just about aesthetics; it drives the efficiency and safety of their trailers. For example, incorporating Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) can significantly enhance the safety features of trailers, reducing accident risks on the road. Moreover, they are a Professional Trailer Manufacturer, Hillsboro Industries, that employs Automotive Quality Management System (AQMS) practices to ensure every trailer meets high standards of quality and performance. By embedding these systems into their design process, they guarantee that each trailer not only meets but exceeds industry expectations. These practices showcase their commitment to quality and innovation, ensuring that their products remain at the forefront of the industry.

Incorporating technology like VIN (Vehicle Identification Number) Decoding and On-Board Diagnostics II (OBD-II) systems is crucial for Hillsboro Industries in ensuring that their trailers are compatible with modern vehicles. This compatibility is essential for maintaining the efficiency and reliability of both the trailers and the vehicles towing them. Additionally, the use of Chassis Dynamometer Testing is a key technique that helps in optimizing trailer performance by simulating real-world driving conditions.

Professional Trailer Manufacturer, Hillsboro Industries, also invests in Automotive Cybersecurity Assessment to protect their trailers from potential cyber threats. This forward-thinking approach not only enhances security but also builds customer trust. As technology continues to evolve, Hillsboro Industries remains committed to integrating these advancements into their trailer designs, keeping them at the cutting edge of the industry.

The Role of Customization in Hillsboro Industries Trailers

Customization plays a pivotal role in Hillsboro Industries’ approach to trailer design. By offering tailored solutions, they cater to the specific needs of their diverse clientele. This customization process often involves Fuel Economy Testing Protocols to ensure that the trailers are optimized for efficiency, which can lead to significant cost savings over their lifecycle.

Furthermore, Hillsboro Industries utilizes Supply Chain Optimization in Tiered Manufacturing to streamline their production processes. This optimization allows for greater flexibility in customization, enabling them to deliver bespoke solutions without compromising on quality or delivery timelines. Such a strategy not only satisfies customer demands but also enhances operational efficiency, reinforcing their commitment to innovative design.

Impact of Innovative Design on Trailer Performance

The impact of innovative design on trailer performance is profound. By integrating advanced features and customization options, Hillsboro Industries’ trailers exhibit enhanced durability and reliability. The inclusion of Collision Repair Estimating Software in their design phase allows for easier maintenance and quicker repairs, minimizing downtime.

Additionally, the focus on Emissions Compliance Reporting ensures that their trailers adhere to environmental standards, reflecting their commitment to sustainability. This adherence not only meets regulatory requirements but also appeals to environmentally conscious consumers. Hillsboro Industries’ dedication to innovative design ultimately results in superior trailer performance, offering value far beyond the initial purchase.

Conclusion

Hillsboro Industries’ emphasis on innovative design is a key differentiator in the trailer manufacturing industry. Their integration of advanced technology and customization options ensures that their trailers meet the highest standards of quality and performance. By prioritizing innovation, they not only enhance the usability and safety of their products but also set a benchmark for others in the industry. For businesses seeking reliable and cutting-edge trailer solutions, Hillsboro Industries remains a leader worth considering.

For more information, visit the Professional Trailer Manufacturer, Hillsboro Industries.

Extended RV Warranty vs Manufacturer’s Warranty: Which Coverage is Better?

As RV enthusiasts and owners know, protecting their investment is a priority. Whether you’re a first-time buyer or have years of experience under your belt, understanding the nuances of warranty coverage can significantly impact your decision-making process. In the RV industry, two primary types of warranties are commonly discussed: the Manufacturer’s Warranty and the Extended RV Warranty. This article will dive into the differences between these two coverage options, weigh their respective pros and cons, and help you determine which warranty best suits your needs.

Extended RV Warranty and Manufacturer’s Warranty Explained

The Manufacturer’s Warranty is typically included when you purchase a new RV. This warranty often covers defects in materials and workmanship within a specified period, usually ranging from one to three years. A key term to understand here is the Warranty Management System, a tool that manufacturers use to track warranty claims and ensure compliance with coverage terms. On the other hand, an Extended RV Warranty extends beyond the original manufacturer’s warranty period, offering continued protection against potential mechanical failures and system breakdowns.

The Extended RV Warranty can be purchased through third-party providers and often covers a broader range of components than the Manufacturer’s Warranty. It’s important for buyers to consult their Dealership Management System (DMS) to understand available coverage options and tailor them to their specific needs. Notably, some extended warranties can also cover labor costs associated with repairs, which is a significant consideration for RV owners.

Differences Between Extended RV Warranty and Manufacturer’s Warranty

One major difference between these warranties lies in their coverage scope and duration. Manufacturer’s Warranties are limited in time and typically cover only the initial years of RV ownership. They often exclude items that are subject to regular wear and tear, like tires and brake pads. In contrast, an Extended RV Warranty can cover these and more, providing peace of mind as RVs age. This is especially relevant in the context of the Automotive Aftermarket, where older vehicles require more frequent maintenance and repairs.

Another distinction is the flexibility of coverage. Manufacturer’s Warranties are standard and non-negotiable, while Extended RV Warranties often offer customizable plans. This allows owners to tailor coverage based on individual needs, whether it’s a focus on Fleet Telematics systems or engine components. Moreover, the Extended RV Warranty can be transferrable, enhancing the Automotive Trade-In Valuation should you decide to sell your RV before the warranty expires.

Pros and Cons of Extended RV Warranty Compared to Manufacturer’s Warranty

The Manufacturer’s Warranty is advantageous because it’s included in the purchase price, offering initial coverage without additional cost. However, its limited duration and scope can leave gaps, especially for those planning to keep their RVs long-term. Extended RV Warranties fill this gap by providing continued coverage even after the Manufacturer’s Warranty expires. This can be particularly beneficial for RVs used in commercial operations, where compliance with Vehicle Emission Standards and other regulations is critical.

On the downside, purchasing an Extended RV Warranty is an additional cost that requires careful consideration. It’s important to evaluate the terms and conditions closely, ensuring that the warranty covers essential systems and adheres to Compliance Auditing for Safety Standards. Additionally, some extended warranties may require a deductible, which could impact your decision if frequent repairs are anticipated.

Choosing the Best Warranty Coverage for Your RV Needs

When selecting the best warranty coverage for your RV, consider factors such as the age and condition of your vehicle, your usage patterns, and your budget. For those purchasing a Certified Pre-Owned (CPO) Program vehicle, an Extended RV Warranty might be more suitable due to the potential for higher mileage and subsequent wear. Additionally, if your RV is part of a rental fleet, a robust extended warranty can mitigate the risk of unexpected repair costs.

Consulting with dealership experts and utilizing resources like the Parts Procurement Process can provide insights into the reliability of specific RV components. Ultimately, the decision should align with your vehicle acquisition strategy and long-term ownership goals.

Dry Fly Hooks vs Wet Fly Hooks: Which Offers Better Trout Catch Rates?

Trout fishing enthusiasts often find themselves at a crossroads when deciding between Dry Fly Hooks and wet fly hooks. While both types of hooks have their unique merits, the choice significantly affects trout catch rates. Understanding the nuances of each hook type can be as critical as using a Value Stream Mapping Tool in optimizing a business process. This article delves into the specific characteristics that distinguish Dry Fly Hooks from wet fly hooks, evaluates their effectiveness in trout fishing, and guides you in selecting the ideal option for your angling success.

Dry Fly Hooks and Their Unique Characteristics

Dry Fly Hooks are designed to mimic the appearance of adult insects floating on the water’s surface. The hooks are typically crafted to be lightweight, allowing the fly to stay afloat and present naturally. This design is akin to an Agile Project Management Framework, where flexibility and adaptability are key. A distinctive feature of Dry Fly Hooks is their ability to engage trout that are actively feeding on the surface. According to recent fishing reports, anglers using Dry Fly Hooks can experience catch rates as high as 50% during peak hatches, making them a popular choice among fly fishers.

The Dry Fly Hooks available from specialized vendors offer a standard design optimized for buoyancy and presentation. Their structure ensures that the fly lands gently on the water, enticing even the most cautious trout. This is similar to employing a Stakeholder Engagement Platform to ensure smooth communication and interaction in a business setting.

For more insights into dry fly fishing techniques, check out this Field & Stream article.

Wet Fly Hooks and Their Advantages for Trout Fishing

Wet fly hooks, on the other hand, are submerged beneath the water’s surface to imitate insects in their nymph or larval stages. They are designed with a heavier body, allowing them to sink effectively. This approach is similar to utilizing a Risk Mitigation Matrix, where comprehensive planning and execution are essential. Wet fly hooks are particularly effective in scenarios where trout are feeding below the surface, giving anglers an edge in varied water conditions.

Research indicates that wet fly hooks can increase catch rates by up to 30% in streams and rivers with high insect activity under the water. Their versatility is comparable to a Workflow Automation Engine, streamlining processes and enhancing efficiency. By adapting to the trout’s feeding behavior, wet fly hooks can provide consistent results throughout different fishing environments.

For a deeper understanding of wet fly fishing strategies, visit this Outdoor Life guide.

Comparing Trout Catch Rates Between Dry and Wet Fly Hooks

The debate over which hook type yields better trout catch rates often depends on environmental factors and personal preference. In conditions where trout are actively rising to the surface, Dry Fly Hooks have been shown to capture up to 60% of the catch. Conversely, when trout are less visible on the surface, wet fly hooks can achieve a 40% higher success rate. This comparison resembles the use of a Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Dashboard to track and analyze performance metrics in a business scenario.

Ultimately, the choice between dry and wet fly hooks should be guided by situational awareness and an understanding of trout behavior. Adapting to changing conditions is as critical in fishing as following a Change Management Procedure in business operations.

Choosing the Right Fly Hook for Optimal Trout Fishing Success

Selecting the appropriate fly hook involves a careful assessment of multiple factors, including water conditions, trout feeding patterns, and personal fishing style. Dry Fly Hooks are ideal for calm waters with visible trout activity on the surface, while wet fly hooks excel in turbulent or deeper waters. This decision-making process is akin to using Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) to map out and improve workflow efficiencies.

Anglers should also consider the seasonal variations and local trout behavior, much like employing a Compliance Audit Checklist to ensure regulatory adherence in business. By tailoring your hook selection to the specific conditions and requirements, you can maximize your chances of a successful trout fishing expedition.

Conclusion

Understanding the strengths and applications of both dry and wet fly hooks is essential for optimizing trout catch rates. Like a well-implemented Resource Allocation Software that enhances operational efficiency, choosing the right hook type can significantly impact your fishing success. For anglers committed to refining their techniques, leveraging the characteristics of each hook type will lead to more rewarding fishing experiences.

RCR NOAPS Race Recap: Watkins Glen International

Jesse Love and the No. 2 Whelen Chevrolet Team Lead Laps at Watkins Glen International Before Heart-Breaking Last Lap Pass Results in Runner-Up Finish

Finish: 2nd
Start: 8th
Points: 3rd

“There’s a hundred small mistakes that let him [Connor Zilisch] get close to our Whelen Chevrolet and at the end of the day, the glaring piece of it is I had a bad corner. It was definitely challenging, but, you know good experience for me. I’ve never saved fuel before on a road course. All I want to do is beat Connor here, right? We’re best friends and we’ve caused each other a lot of pain. I didn’t execute when I needed to, and I think the reason I’m so quiet is I’m just embarrassed. As a driver, you can’t make those mistakes, and it was such a bad mistake, it’s just embarrassing. So, I know that I’ll learn from this and be better because of it, but I let down a lot of people, including myself, most importantly, and you know, maybe it’s probably a good idea for me to feel this pain right now.” -Jesse Love

Top-Five Day for Austin Hill and the No. 21 Bennett Transportation & Logistics Chevrolet Team Spoiled on Last Lap at Watkins Glen International

Finish: 11th
Start: 9th
Points: 7th

“I was short shifting, running half throttle, lifting early for the brake zones, doing everything that I felt like I needed to do to be able to make it to the end on fuel. I’m kind of scratching my head right now, of what was the reason we ran out as early as we did. It was super early in the lap in Turn 3, up the esses. It ran out, then came back to life, and then it ran out again exiting the carousel. Without any of the strategy that went on, we had a solid day. I thought we had a top-five car. We probably weren’t going to win the race, but we were at least going to have a solid day. It’s just frustrating for our Bennett Transportation & Logistics Chevrolet team, and everybody at RCR and ECR to have a solid top-five going today and get it stripped away by running out of fuel.” -Austin Hill

Connor Zilisch overtakes Jesse Love on final lap for third consecutive O’Reilly victory at Watkins Glen

WATKINS GLEN, NEW YORK - MAY 09: Connor Zilisch, driver of the #1 Jockey 150 Years Chevrolet, celebrates in victory lane after winning the NASCAR O'Reilly Auto Parts Series Mission 200 at The Glen at Watkins Glen International on May 09, 2026 in Watkins Glen, New York. (Photo by Chris Graythen/Getty Images).

Connor Zilisch remains undefeated in the NASCAR O’Reilly Auto Parts Series at Watkins Glen International for a third consecutive year. His latest victory occurred on Saturday, May 9, after executing a final lap overtake on Jesse Love on the final turn to win a wild conclusion to the Mission 200.

The 19-year-old Zilisch from Charlotte, North Carolina, led five times for 20 of 82 scheduled laps. He bolted his way from starting in 17th place and raced upfront during the majority of the event. After strategically pitting before the first stage’s conclusion to cycle to the lead for the first time at the start of the second stage period, Zilisch swapped the lead with teammate Shane van Gisbergen during two restarts before the former prevailed to win the second stage.

Then, despite getting hit by van Gisbergen while pitting during the second stage’s break period and restarting within the top-15 mark to start the third and final stage period, Zilisch remained in contention until he strategically pitted under green with 26 laps remaining. While marching his way back to the front, he spent the event’s remainder reeling in on Jesse Love as Love was trying to stretch his low-fuel tank to win over Zilisch. During the final corner on the final lap, however, Love locked up his tires and went wide. This allowed Zilisch to overtake him and steal the victory amid a thrilling finish.

On-track qualifying, scheduled for early Saturday, was canceled due to rain. As a result, the event’s starting lineup was determined through a qualifying metric formula from the NASCAR rule book. From the formula, Rajah Caruth, who returns as the driver of the No. 88 HendrickCars.com Chevrolet Camaro entry that won last weekend at Texas Motor Speedway while being piloted by Kyle Larson, was awarded the pole position. He shared the front row with teammate Justin Allgaier.

Before the event, Sheldon Creed started at the rear of the field due to having his No. 00 Haas Factory Team Chevrolet Camaro entry repaired from damage sustained from a practice accident entering the Esses. Dean Thompson and Matt Wilson also dropped to the rear of the field due to respective changes of transmission and power steering/brakes made to their entries.

When the green flag waved and the event commenced, teammates Rajah Caruth and Justin Allgaier dueled for the lead through the frontstretch until Caruth locked his front tires entering the first turn. As a result, he went wide entering the first turn and forced Allgaier up and off the racing zone in the first turn. Amid the chaos, Sam Mayer snuck by both and assumed the lead through the Esses, the Back Straight and the Inner Loop “Bus Stop” Chicane. As the field behind jostled early for spots, Mayer proceeded to lead the remaining turns before he returned to the frontstretch and led the first lap over Allgaier, Brent Crews, Caruth and Brandon Jones, who followed suit, respectively.

Mayer retained the lead over the next two laps before Crews overtook him on the third lap when Mayer went wide in the first turn. With the lead in his possession, Crews extended his lead to a second during the fourth lap and he was scored as the leader by one-and-a-half seconds over Mayer at the fifth lap mark. Meanwhile, Allgaier trailed in third place by more than two seconds and teammate Connor Zilisch, who started 17th, bolted his way up to fourth place while Jesse Love was up in fifth place over Caruth, Shane van Gisbergen, Brandon Jones, Parker Retzlaff and Austin Hill, respectively. Meanwhile, Jeb Burton lost a lap to the leaders after he limped around the track slowly with a flat left-front tire while Patrick Staropoli blew an engine in Turn 11.

Through the first 10 scheduled laps, Crews continued to lead by three-and-a-half seconds over Mayer while Zilisch outdueled teammate Allgaier for third place. While Love retained fifth place, van Gisbergen was up to sixth place over Caruth, Jones, Retzlaff and Hill, while William Sawalich, Taylor Gray, Sammy Smith, Jeremy Clements, Ryan Sieg, Anthony Alfredo, Brennan Poole, Ross Chastain, Corey Day and Lavar Scott trailed in the top 20, respectively.

Just past Lap 15, Sawalich dropped off the pace due to a mechanical issue. As Sawalich plummeted below the leaderboard while trying to limp his entry to pit road, where he retired from competition, the event remained under green as Crews maintained a comfortable lead. Two laps later, teammates Zilisch and van Gisbergen, along with Gray, Sammy Smith, Poole and Carson Kvapil strategically pitted under green. The latter six were the only competitors to pit prior to pit road becoming inaccessible to the field to mark the conclusion of the first stage period, which occurred on Lap 18. At this time, Crews was leading by more than nine seconds over Mayer.

When the first stage period concluded on Lap 20, Crews cruised to his first O’Reilly career stage victory. Mayer trailed in second place by nine seconds while Allgaier, Love, Jones, Austin Hill, Caruth, Retzlaff, Ross Chastain and Ryan Sieg, all of whom trailed Crews by double digits, were scored in the top 10, respectively. By then, 27 of 38 starters were scored on the lead lap while Zilisch and van Gisbergen, both of whom pitted a few laps ago, carved their way up to 18th and 19th, respectively.

Under the event’s first stage break period, a majority of the field led by Crews pitted while the rest led by Zilisch, van Gisbergen, Taylor Gray and Sammy Smith, all of whom short-pitted before the first stage’s conclusion, remained on the track.

The second stage period started on Lap 24 as Zilisch and van Gisbergen occupied the front row. At the start, both dueled for the lead through the frontstretch and they remained side-by-side entering the Esses until Zilisch motored ahead by the time the field reached the Back Straight. As the field behind jostled for spots, Zilisch retained the lead for a full lap as he led the next lap over van Gisbergen while Smith, Love and Crews pursued in the top five, respectively.

On Lap 25, the caution returned when Lavar Scott spun in the first turn while Jeremy Clements, woh slid sideways as he approached Scott, plowed into the tire barriers. As the event restarted three laps later, van Gisbergen dueled with Zilisch through the frontstretch before he used the preferred inside lane in the first turn to move ahead of Zilisch with the lead. Van Gisbergen maintained the lead for barely a full lap, where he led the next one, before Zilisch dueled and reassumed the lead entering the first turn.

During the Lap 33 mark, the caution returned when Lavar Scott was involved in a second incident of the event, with his latest occurrence being the driver spinning entering the frontstretch while trying to get beneath Will Rodgers. As a result, he then rear-ended his entry into the outside wall and knocked his rear bumper cover off. During this caution period, Caruth, Harrison Burton, Carson Kvapil, Blaine Perkins, Glen Reen and Kyle Sieg pitted while the rest, led by Zilisch, remained on the track.

With four laps remaining in the second stage period, the event restarted under green. At the start, Zilisch fended off van Gisbergen through the frontstretch and the first turn to retain the lead. While Zilisch muscled ahead, Crews overtook van Gisbergen for the runner-up spot as he tried to reel in Zilisch for the lead. With van Gisbergen, Allgaier and Love trailing in the top five, Zilisch led the next lap.

When the second stage period concluded on Lap 40, Zilisch, who had retained the lead since the previous restart, captured the stage victory over Crews. Van Gisbergen, Allgaier, Love, Gray, Hill, Mayer, Sammy Smith and Jones were scored in the top 10, respectively, while 32 of 38 starters were scored on the lead lap.

During the event’s second stage break period, some led by Zilisch and van Gisbergen pitted while the rest led by Crews and including Love, Hill, Jones, Retzlaff, Day, Caruth, Harrison Burton, Carson Kvapil, Blaine Perkins, Kyle Sieg and Preston Pardus remained on the track. During the pit stops, van Gisbergen hit the right side of Zilisch’s entry while trying to exit his pit stall. The collision forced van Gisbergen to return to pit road for repairs while Zilisch, who was the first competitor to exit pit road, restarted within the top-15 mark.

With 38 laps remaining, the final stage period commenced as Crews and Love occupied the front row. At the start, Crews motored away from the field through the frontstretch and he retained the lead through the first turn before he navigated his way through the Esses, the Back Straight and the Bus Stop with a steady advantage. While Hill navigated his way into the runner-up spot, teammate Love settled in third in front of Day, Jones and Retzlaff as Crews led the next lap.

Then, with 36 laps remaining, the caution returned when Sheldon Creed got knocked off the racing groove by Allgaier through the Bus Stop and briefly launched in the air after the front splitter of his entry dug through the grass. During this caution period, a majority of the field led by Crews remained on the track while some, including Austin Hill, Chastain, Retzlaff, Gray Love, Perkins, Austin Green and Ryan Ellis pitted.

The next restart with 32 laps remaining featured Crews rocketing away from Day, teammate Jones and the field through the frontstretch and the first turn before he pulled away by a large advantage through the Esses. Crews easily led the next lap ahead of Jones while Harrison Burton, Zilisch and Day trailed in the top five. As the event reached its final 30-lap mark, Crews, who was racing on fumes in terms of fuel mileage, extended his advantage to more than a second over Jones while Zilisch, Harrison Burton, Day, Caruth, Allgaier, Kvapil, Mayer and van Gisbergen were in the top 10.

With 26 laps remaining, Crews surrendered the lead to pit under green, though he endured a slow pit service and had a fire briefly spark while trying to get his car loaded with fuel. During his pit stops, Harrison Burton and Poole also pitted with Crews while Zilisch cycled to a two-second lead over Jones, moments before Zilisch and Jones pitted a lap later. This allowed van Gisbergen to lead by one-and-a-half seconds over Caruth with 25 laps remaining while Allgaier, Kvapil and Anthony Alfredo were in the top five.

With 23 laps remaining and as the top of fuel concerns continued to loom amongst the field, teammates Allgaier and Sammy Smith pitted under green with 23 laps remaining before van Gisbergen pitted from the lead. Caruth cycled to the lead before he pitted with 18 laps remaining. This allowed Love to cycle to the lead. As the latter led, Zilisch was mired in 12th while Crews was in 14th.

Down to the final 10 laps of the event, Love, who was racing on fumes with fuel, maintained the lead by more than three seconds over teammate Hill while Zilisch, who navigated up to third place but was posting faster lap times than Love, trailed by six-and-a-half seconds. Behind, Gray and Chastain were in the top five while Crews, who trailed Zilisch by eight seconds, was mired in sixth place.

Three laps later, Zilisch battled and overtook Hill for second place. By then, both trailed Love by more than three seconds. As Love approached lapped traffic, he maintained the lead by more than two seconds over a hard-charging Zilisch with five laps remaining. Meanwhile, Zilisch, who ran over the curbs thought the Bus Stop and nearly got loose, slightly damaged the right side of his front splitter through the grass. Amid the incident, Zilisch remained within striking distance of Love through every turn and straightaway as the laps dwindled.

When the white flag waved and the final lap started, Love remained in the lead by six-tenths of a second over Zilisch, who initially trailed Love by more than a second. Through the frontstretch, the first turn and the Esses, Zilisch had Love within his sight. After navigating through the Back Straight, he reeled in and nearly got close to Love’s rear bumper through the Bus Stop, but Love remained in defensive mode as he maintained the lead leading up to the final two turns.

Then, before the final turn, Love locked up the front tires as Zilisch reeled in close to Love’s rear bumper. This allowed Zilisch to get beneath Love and overtake him without making contact, entering the frontstretch. With Love unable to regain momentum, Zilisch motored away and claimed the checkered flag by two-tenths of a second over Love.

With the victory, Zilisch, who finished in the runner-up spot during Friday’s Craftsman Truck Series event at The Glen, collected his 13th O’Reilly Auto Parts Series career victory and his second to a part-time campaign in 2026 with JR Motorsports and the No. 1 Chevrolet team led by crew chief Rodney Childers. In addition, Zilisch became the first competitor to win at The Glen in the O’Reilly division for three consecutive years since Marcos Ambrose achieved the previous feat between 2008 and 2010.

Zilisch’s O’Reilly victory in 2026 was a redemptive moment for the North Carolina native amid a difficult Cup Series campaign, where. The victory was also redemptive as he exited through the top roof hatch to celebrate in Victory Lane. A year ago, he fell while standing alongside his window cell to celebrate in Victory Lane a year ago and broke his collarbone.

“That was [me] driving as hard as I could for all 30 of those laps,” Zilisch said in Victory Lane on the CW Network. “Just trying to make up that gap. I wasn’t gonna move Jesse in the last corner there, but he got in deep. I was able to get by. It’s so cool to come back and get my third win at Watkins Glen in a row with [JR Motorsports]. Cool to get it with [crew chief] Rodney [Childers]. It’s my third different crew chief here. It really means a lot to get another one here and get out of the car safely and make it onto the ground without trying to kill myself.”

Meanwhile, Love was left devastated on pit road after having a first victory of this season evaporate amid a final lap lockup.

“What a good mental challenge for me,” Love said. “All I want to do is beat Connor here. We’re best friends and we’ve caused each other a lot of pain. I didn’t execute when I needed to. I think the reason I’m so quiet is I’m just embarrassed. As a driver, you can’t make those mistakes. It was such a bad mistake. It’s just embarrassing. I know that I’ll learn from this and be better because of it, but I let down a lot of people, including myself, most importantly. Maybe it’s probably a good idea for me to feel this pain right now.”

Taylor Gray finished in third place while Ross Chastain and Brandon Jones finished in the top five. Brent Crews, who led a race-high 32 laps, settled in sixth place while Parker Retzlaff, Shane van Gisbergen, Austin Green and Justin Allgaier completed the top 10 in the final running order.

There were 13 lead changes for six different leaders. The event featured five cautions for 13 laps. In addition, 25 of 38 starters finished on the lead lap.

Following the 13th event of the 2026 NASCAR O’Reilly Auto Parts Series season, Justin Allgaier continues to lead the standings by 155 points over Sheldon Creed, 161 over Jesse Love, 207 over Brandon Jones and 218 over Corey Day.

Results:

  1. Connor Zilisch, 20 laps led, Stage 2 winner
  2. Jesse Love, 18 laps led
  3. Taylor Gray
  4. Ross Chastain
  5. Brandon Jones
  6. Brent Crews, 32 laps led, Stage 1 winner
  7. Parker Retzlaff
  8. Shane van Gisbergen, seven laps led
  9. Austin Green
  10. Justin Allgaier
  11. Austin Hill
  12. Rajah Caruth, two laps led
  13. Sam Mayer, three laps led
  14. Carson Kvapil
  15. Corey Day
  16. Sammy Smith
  17. Harrison Burton
  18. Brennan Poole
  19. Alex Labbe
  20. Will Rodgers
  21. Preston Pardus
  22. Josh Bilicki
  23. Ryan Sieg
  24. Anthony Alfredo
  25. Jeb Burton
  26. Blaine Perkins – OUT, Out of Fuel
  27. Lavar Scott – OUT, Out of Fuel
  28. Alex Guenette, one lap down
  29. Sheldon Creed, one lap down
  30. Glen Reen, one lap down
  31. Kyle Sieg, one lap down
  32. Derek White, four laps down
  33. Jeremy Clements, eight laps down
  34. Ryan Ellis – OUT, Suspension
  35. Dean Thompson – OUT, Transmission
  36. William Sawalich – OUT, Engine
  37. Matt Wilson – OUT, Accident
  38. Patrick Staropoli – OUT Engine

Next on the 2026 NASCAR O’Reilly Auto Parts Series schedule is the BetRivers 200 at Dover Motor Speedway in Dover, Delaware. The event is scheduled to occur next Saturday, May 16, and air at 4 p.m. ET on the CW Network, PRN and SiriusXM.

Christian Lundgaard makes gutsy kink pass to win at the Brickyard

INDIANAPOLIS - MAY 9: Christian Lundgaard, driver of the #7 Arrow McLaren Velo Chevrolet, celebrates in victory lane after winning the NTT IndyCar Series Sonsio Grand Prix at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway on May 9, 2026, in Indianapolis. Photo: Walt Kuhn/Penske Entertainment

INDIANAPOLIS — It looked different to Christian Lundgaard inside the car than it did on TV.

“You know, at the end of the day, I’ve been now watching it on the TV screen probably 50 times, but it doesn’t look the same way as what it felt,” he said.

He thought he had maybe one or two chances to pass David Malukas, after the undercut failed to cycle him ahead of Malukas with 20 laps to go.

“I struggled a lot on out laps,” he said. “He seemed to be a little better than I was.”

Romain Grosjean was ahead and slowed down Malukas just enough for him to set up a pass on the outside through Turn 2 through Turn 4. At which point, he went full send, damn the torpedos and pressed the attack.

With a bold pass in the Turns 5 and 6 kink on the backstretch at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway, Lundgaard overtook Malukas for the race lead with 18 laps to go and took the checkered flag in the Sonsio Grand Prix.

“It feels awesome right now, and I’m sure I will probably realize tomorrow what really happened today,” he said. “It really wasn’t what I expected waking up this morning. Obviously with qualifying getting pushed to this morning and racing the same day, it’s not really a traditional IndyCar weekend.”

It’s his second career victory in his 74th NTT INDYCAR SERIES start and first of the 2026 season.

David Malukas led a race high 27 laps on his way to a runner-up finish and Graham Rahal rounded out the podium.

“Honestly, I mean it was a good move,” Malukas said. “It was fair play. You know, looking back, I keep seeing this replay just playing over and over again be, which is fantastic. You get to just watch it happen over and over.

“It was a fair play. Looking back, I thought, man, I could have been a lot more aggressive, but in the end there’s an art to knowing when you’ve lost the spot. I ended up just giving out and, look, the thing is, I could have pushed him a little bit wider and then not complete the pass, but we could have had contact, something could have happened, we could have lost a lot of pace and now Rahal is coming in.

“The thing is, if he’s not going to get me that lap, he’s going to get me the next one or the other one after that. He had push-to-pass. We were running out. It was just a matter of attrition. I thought, he’s got it. I might as well do the same move.”

Josef Newgarden and points leader/pole sitter Alex Palou rounded out the top-five.

Scott Dixon rebounded from a Lap 1 wreck to finish sixth. Louis Foster, Dennis Hauger, Kyle Kirkwood and Nolan Siegel round out the top-10.

Christian Lundgaard makes gutsy kink pass to win at the Brickyard

Race summary

Palou led the field to green at 4:59 p.m. Just as the field came up to speed, Rinus VeeKay slammed into the back of another car and destroyed his front wing. Entering Turn 1, Felix Rosenqvist locked up and turned Pato O’Ward. Newgarden got into Dixon and turned him. Then he and Caio Collet rammed into Rosenqvist. For the avoidable contact, race control assessed Rosenqvist a drive-through penalty.

Back to green on Lap 6, race control handed Scott McLaughlin a three-place penalty for blocking Foster. Aside from that, and a piece of debris laying in Turn 9 that came off Malukas’ car, the field settled into a green flag rhythm. Also, another piece of debris fell onto the track in Turn 7. During all this, multiple cars ducked onto pit road to switch onto Firestone reds. A local caution flew on Lap 21 when Alexander Rossi’s car stalled on track on the start/finish line. Only after he exited the car and hopped over the pit wall did the full course caution fly. During the caution, Palou and Kirkwood pitted and handed the lead to Will Power.

Back to green on Lap 27, caution flew for a multi-car incident in Turn 13. Sting Ray Robb locked up and hit O’Ward. Simpson turned inwards to avoid the spinning O’Ward. Rosenqvist clipped him and got airborne briefly. During the caution, Power pitted from the lead and Malukas took over the race lead.

Back to green on Lap 33, Palou kicked off a cycle of green flag stops on Lap 38 and took a set of Firestone reds. Kirkwood responded the following lap by pitting from seventh. His crew had trouble with the right-front tire and Palou cycled out ahead of him. Malukas pitted from the lead on Lap 47. Lundgaard pitted from the lead on Lap 48 and Power cycled back to the lead.

O’Ward kicked off the final cycle of pit stops on Lap 57. Power pitted from the lead on Lap 58. He locked up exiting pit lane and drove outside the blend line area. Thus race control handed him a drive-through penalty for improper pit exit. As the pit cycle played out, Lundgaard cut down the lead to Malukas. On Lap 65, Lundgaard undercut him by pitting on Lap 65. Malukas pit from the lead with 20 laps to go and cycled out ahead of Lundgaard.

With 18 laps to go, Lundgaard pulled to Malukas’ outside and passed him through the backstretch kink to take the race lead and drove on to victory.

Christian Lundgaard makes gutsy kink pass to win at the Brickyard

Nuts and bolts

The race lasted one hour, 55 minutes and 42 seconds, at an average speed of 107.536 mph. There were six lead changes among four different drivers and three cautions for 12 laps.

Palou leaves with a 27-point lead over Kirkwood.

The NTT INDYCAR Series returns to action, May 24, for the Indianapolis 500.

TOYOTA RACING – NOAPS Watkins Glen Post-Race Report – 05.09.26

GRAY LEADS THREE TOYOTAS IN THE TOP-SIX AT WATKINS GLEN
Crews scores first stage win, leads the most laps

WATKINS GLEN, NY (May 9, 2026) – Taylor Gray saved just enough gas and crossed the finish line in third to lead Toyota in the NASCAR O’Reilly Auto Parts Series race at Watkins Glen International on Saturday. The Kansas-winner moved back inside the top-10 in points with his top-five run.

Brandon Jones finished fifth, his career-best at Watkins Glen. It is his fourth consecutive top-10 finish, and moved him up to a season-best fourth in points.

Toyota Development Driver Brent Crews was impressive throughout the race as he won his first career stage and led a race-high 32 laps before a vibration in the final laps caused his pace to slow down. He was able to hold on to finish sixth – his fifth consecutive top-six finish. Despite missing four races before turning 18 in March, Crews has now moved inside the Chase field as he sits 11th overall.

TOYOTA RACING Post-Race Recap
NASCAR O’Reilly Auto Parts Series (NOAPS)
Watkins Glen International
Race 13 of 33 – 200.9 miles, 82 laps

TOYOTA FINISHING POSITIONS

1st, Connor Zilisch*
2nd, Jesse Love*
3rd, TAYLOR GRAY
4th, Ross Chastain*
5th, BRANDON JONES
6th, BRENT CREWS
17th, HARRISON BURTON
30th, GLEN REEN
35th, DEAN THOMPSON
36th, WILLIAM SAWALICH
*non-Toyota driver

TOYOTA QUOTES

TAYLOR GRAY, No. 54 Operation 300 Toyota GR Supra, Joe Gibbs Racing

Finishing Position: 3rd

What were the challenges of saving fuel at the end?

“First of all, super proud of everyone at Joe Gibbs Racing, and thank you to TOYOTA RACING, Operation 300 and M-Experiment. It was challenging at times. I was just trying to execute my job inside the car, saving fuel and lifting early, shorting my shifts up to make it to the end. Really proud of Jason Ratcliff (crew chief) for that strategy call. Really good strategy. I felt like straight up we were a fifth-to-seventh place car, but obviously really proud of everyone on the 54 team to be able to score a better finish.”

BRANDON JONES, No. 20 Menards/Pelonis Toyota GR Supra, Joe Gibbs Racing

Finishing Position: 5th

Top-five at Watkins Glen. Can you talk about your race?

“Honestly, I’m going to give a lot of that credit to Sam McAuley (crew chief), because that strategy to pit when we did and then to have enough fuel. It is hit or miss, but every once in a while, you get a green flag run, and you get so spread out, and the tire grip got really low there at the end. There wasn’t – from my perspective – so many people saving. Typically, when you have races like that, you know it is going to go green there at the end because people aren’t wanting to be aggressive with each other, so we just maximized our day, really. That’s what I wanted to do. We got stage points in both stages, a really good finish – a career-best here. Thanks to everyone at Pelonis. I think this is their last race of the year, but we had a bunch of them, Menards and Toyota as always. A lot of momentum. We are going into a great track in Dover for us. We are continuing to get better, and our road course stuff is a work a progress for us, but I’m liking what I’m seeing.”

BRENT CREWS, No. 19 WIX Filters Toyota GR Supra, Joe Gibbs Racing

Finishing Position: 6th

Stellar points day, but I know that last stage didn’t go the way you wanted it to. Can you talk about the day as a whole and that last stage?

“The car was great all day. It was cool to have WIX Filters on our Supra. First time having them aboard, the colors looked great out there. I felt like I had an amazing car all day. We were the one to beat. We were better than the 1 (Connor Zilisch) for sure. Just there at the end – that last stop, it was a little slow, then the motor shut off, and I was trying to get it back running. It was shooting flames and all of that stuff, but after that I had a super, super bad vibration. One of the worst ones I’ve ever had – not sure what that was, but really, really slowed down our pace there at the end. Not sure what it was. I know they will look it over and figure out what the issue was and fix it for next time.”

About Toyota

Toyota (NYSE:TM) has been a part of the cultural fabric in North America for nearly 70 years, and is committed to advancing sustainable, next-generation mobility through our Toyota and Lexus brands, plus our more than 1,800 dealerships.

Toyota directly employs nearly 64,000 people in North America who have contributed to the design, engineering, and assembly of over 50 million cars and trucks at our 14 manufacturing plants. In 2025, Toyota’s plant in North Carolina began to assemble automotive batteries for electrified vehicles.

For more information about Toyota, visit www.ToyotaNewsroom.com.

Kucharczyk Breaks Through for First INDY NXT Win at IMS

INDIANAPOLIS (Saturday, May 9, 2026) – Tymek Kucharczyk was Mr. Consistency for the first five races of the INDY NXT by Firestone season. But now he’s a winner.

Series rookie Kucharczyk, the first Polish driver to compete in the INDYCAR development series, earned his first career victory by holding off Max Taylor to win Race 2 of the Indianapolis Grand Prix doubleheader Saturday on the Indianapolis Motor Speedway road course.

“What a special day,” Kucharczyk said. “To do it here, coming back to November in my first test in an INDY NXT car, now a winner here at Indy, it’s spectacular. I’m so grateful to my sponsors, to my team. It was a tough race. It was really, really hard to hold Max behind me. He was pushing me for the whole race.”

Kucharczyk was the only driver to record a top-five finish in the first five races this season, but his best was third place, three times. He finished fourth in Race 1 of this doubleheader in mixed conditions Friday.

But Kucharczyk climbed from fifth to the lead after the first two turns on the 14-turn, 2.439-mile circuit, leading all 30 laps in the No. 71 HMD Motorsports car. He took the checkered flag .6273 of a second ahead of Taylor in the No. 28 Susan G. Komen machine of Andretti Global after a taut, race-long duel in the caution-free race.

Enzo Fittipaldi, who won Race 1 Friday, prevailed in an exciting three-way fight over the last 10 laps of the race for the final podium spot in the No. 67 HMD Motorsports machine. Lochie Hughes placed fourth in the No. 26 Andretti Global car, with Alessandro de Tullio rounding out the top five in the No. 14 AJ Foyt Racing entry.

Series leader Nikita Johnson placed sixth in the No. 21 Cape Motorsports Powered by ECR car. Kucharczyk climbed to second in the standings with his win, 11 points behind Johnson.

There were two main flashpoints in the race, which took place under sunny skies in a contrast to the wet conditions at the finish Friday.

The first came at the green flag. Taylor started from pole and went side by side with Josh Pierson’s No. 29 Starchive Andretti entry of Andretti Global, with both cars going wide. Kucharczyk snuck through the opening for the lead, with Taylor clinging to second.

Kucharczyk maintained a gap of six- to seven-tenths of a second for the next 16 laps before the second main incident of the race. Kucharczyk locked his right front wheel braking for Turn 1 on Lap 17, creating a large flat spot on his Firestone Firehawk tire.

“Other than the lockup that I made midway through the race, it was a pretty flawless execution,” Kucharczyk said. “I don’t think we had probably the fastest car on the grid today, but the first lap helped me massively. Max was pushing really hard, so I had to save the Push to Pass at the end, as well. It’s all good. I made it happen, so super, super grateful.”

Taylor pulled to within .4807 of a second on Lap 23, and it appeared the flat spot on his tire may have started to sap speed from Kucharczyk. But the Pole managed his tires and saved enough Push to Pass engine boost to increase the gap to .7830 of a second on Lap 25. He maintained a steady gap to the checkered flag.

“That was everything,” Taylor said of his effort. “I thought we were going to catch him. I messed up on the start, I think. So, something to look over. But still good points, decent points this weekend, and a lot to take away and a lot to improve on if we want to win this championship.”

Taylor is third in the standings, three points behind Kucharczyk and 14 behind Johnson.

The next INDY NXT by Firestone race is the Detroit Grand Prix on Sunday, May 31 on the streets of Detroit.

Shane van Gisbergen wins first Cup pole of 2026 at Watkins Glen

WATKINS GLEN, NEW YORK - MAY 09: Shane Van Gisbergen, driver of the #97 Superfile Chevrolet, poses for photos after winning the pole award during qualifying for the NASCAR Cup Series Go Bowling at The Glen at Watkins Glen International on May 09, 2026 in Watkins Glen, New York. (Photo by Sean Gardner/Getty Images).

Shane van Gisbergen flexed his road-course muscles in a big way by notching his first Busch Light Pole Award of the 2026 NASCAR Cup Series season for the Go Bowling at The Glen (Watkins Glen International) on Saturday, May 9.

The event’s qualifying format at Watkins Glen International consisted of a single session. In this session, the field of 38 is given 35 minutes to post the fastest qualifying lap and all competitors qualify simultaneously. At the conclusion of both group sessions, the fastest competitor was awarded the pole position.

Van Gisbergen, was the 11th-fastest competitor in practice earlier on Saturday, and during the qualifying session, he posted his best lap at 123.937 mph in 71.165 seconds. Van Gisbergen’s lap was enough for the three-time Supercars champion from Auckland, New Zealand, to secure the pole position over Michael McDowell.

With the pole, van Gisbergen notched his fifth Cup Series career pole position, all of which have occurred on five distinct road/street course venues. In addition to securing his first Cup pole at The Glen, he also recorded his first pole since Sonoma Raceway in July 2025 and the third pole of the 2026 season for Chevrolet, along with the first for Trackhouse Racing.

Van Gisbergen, who is currently campaigning in his sophomore season in the Cup Series division, is currently ranked in 19th place in the 2026 driver’s standings and he trails the top-16 cutline to be in Chase contention by 27 points. Having scored two top-10 results and an average-finishing result of 21.0 through 11 Cup events in 2026, van Gisbergen will strive to contend for his first victory of this season and reignite his road course magic after winning five times in 2025. After finishing in third place during Friday’s Craftsman Truck Series event at The Glen, van Gisbergen is also competing in Saturday’s O’Reilly Auto Parts Series event at The Glen with JR Motorsports as he strives to sweep both the O’Reilly and Cup main events.

“The [No. 97] guys did a good job tuning [the car] what I needed for the one lap,” van Gisbergen, who is striving for rear tire grip for Sunday’s main event, said. “The Superfile Chevy was really good, but all Trackhouse [Racing] cars in the top five as well. We got some good cars here this weekend and hopefully, we can capitalize on that tomorrow.”

Van Gisbergen will share the front row with Michael McDowell, the latter of whom clocked in his fastest lap at 123.488 mph in 71.424 seconds. Sunday’s Cup event at The Glen will mark McDowell’s first time starting on the front row in 2026.

Austin Cindric (fastest during Saturday’s practice), Ross Chastain and rookie Connor Zilisch, the latter two are teammates with van Gisbergen at Trackhouse Racing, will start in the top five, respectively. Joey Logano, Ryan Blaney, Christopher Bell, Chase Briscoe and Ty Gibbs completed the top-10 starting grid, respectively.

With 38 competitors vying for 38 starting spots, all made the main event.

Watkins Glen – Qualifying Position, Best Speed, Best Time:

  1. Shane van Gisbergen, 123.937 mph, 71.165 seconds
  2. Michael McDowell, 123.488 mph, 71.424 seconds
  3. Austin Cindric, 123.452 mph, 71.445 seconds
  4. Ross Chastain, 123.445 mph, 71.449 seconds
  5. Connor Zilisch, 123.386 mph, 71.483 seconds
  6. Joey Logano, 123.319 mph, 71.522 seconds
  7. Ryan Blaney, 123.317 mph, 71.523 seconds
  8. Christopher Bell, 123.215 mph, 71.582 seconds
  9. Chase Briscoe, 123.214 mph, 71.583 seconds
  10. Ty Gibbs, 123.159 mph, 71.615 seconds
  11. Carson Hocevar, 123.150 mph, 71.620 seconds
  12. AJ Allmendinger, 123.092 mph, 71.654 seconds
  13. William Byron, 123.074 mph, 71.664 seconds
  14. Chris Buescher, 123.067 mph, 71.668 seconds
  15. Tyler Reddick, 123.014 mph, 71.699 seconds
  16. Daniel Suarez, 122.973 mph, 71.723 seconds
  17. John Hunter Nemechek, 122.946 mph, 71.739 seconds
  18. Bubba Wallace, 122.918 mph, 71.755 seconds
  19. Cole Custer, 122.761 mph, 71.847 seconds
  20. Denny Hamlin, 122.749 mph, 71.854 seconds
  21. Kyle Busch, 122.687 mph, 71.890 seconds
  22. Todd Gilliland, 122.600 mph, 71.941 seconds
  23. Kyle Larson, 122.566 mph, 71.961 seconds
  24. Erik Jones, 122.548 mph, 71.972 seconds
  25. Austin Dillon, 122.502 mph, 71.999 seconds
  26. Brad Keselowski, 122.398 mph, 72.060 seconds
  27. Chase Elliott, 122.386 mph, 72.067 seconds
  28. Alex Bowman, 122.339 mph, 72.095 seconds
  29. Ricky Stenhouse Jr., 122.293 mph, 72.122 seconds
  30. Ryan Preece, 122.289 mph, 72.124 seconds
  31. Ty Dillon, 122.249 mph, 72.148 seconds
  32. Riley Herbst, 122.059 mph, 72.260 seconds
  33. Zane Smith, 122.052 mph, 72.264 seconds
  34. Josh Berry, 121.464 mph, 72.614 seconds
  35. Noah Gragson, 121.426 mph, 72.637 seconds
  36. Cody Ware, 120.493 mph, 73.199 seconds
  37. Josh Bilicki, 119.044 mph, 74.090 seconds
  38. Katherine Legge, 115.299 mph, 76.497 seconds

The 2026 Go Bowling at The Glen is scheduled for Sunday, May 10, and will air at 3 p.m. ET on FS1, MRN Radio, SiriusXM and HBO MAX.