Home Blog Page 21

VANDERGRIFF, KALITTA & GLENN WIN BIG AT MOPAR NHRA LAS VEGAS NATIONALS

  • Vandergriff gets dramatic FC win
  • Kalitta stays in title hunt with TF victory
  • Dominant PS weekend for points leader Glenn
  • PSM final moved to Pomona due to wind

LAS VEGAS (Nov. 1, 2026) – Funny Car championship contender Jordan Vandergriff closed in on points leader Matt Hagan in dramatic fashion on Sunday at The Strip at Las Vegas Motor Speedway, defeating Ron Capps in the final round at the MOPAR NHRA Las Vegas Nationals powered by Dodge.

Doug Kalitta (Top Fuel) and Dallas Glenn (Pro Stock) also won the 19th of 20 races during the 2026 NHRA Mission Foods Drag Racing Series season and the fifth of six races in the Countdown to the Championship playoffs. Due to excessive winds, the Pro Stock Motorcycle final round will be contested at the finale in Pomona.

Needing a victory to have an opportunity to track down Hagan, a four-time champion, in Pomona, Vandergriff and his John Force Racing team came through in the clutch, as Vandergriff went 3.873-seconds at 331.36 mph in his 12,000-horsepower Cornwell Tools Chevrolet SS to power past Capps’ 3.921 at 335.15.

It’s the fourth win of the season for Vandergriff and this was certainly the biggest, as he pulled to within 39 points of Hagan with one race left. It was also another shining moment for Vandergriff in his Funny Car debut season, getting past Julie Nataas, Spencer Hyde and J.R. Todd, going 3.911 at 327.90 in another major matchup with Todd, who beat Hagan in the second round.

That set up another marquee showdown with Capps and Vandergriff quickly tracked down the veteran, setting up what will be a must-see showdown at the In-N-Out Burger NHRA Finals in Pomona.

“This is the biggest win [of the year],” Vandergriff said. “Today literally worked out as I envisioned it this morning. It was, how do we need today to go? We need the day to go a certain way. We need somebody else to lose. We need this. We need that, and it literally played itself out the way I imagined.

“This fourth win I think is obviously huge, just because we’re 39 points back now of Hagan, and coming in today we were a really, really long shot. It felt like we were far away and we needed him to go out early, and he did. Now we can go to Pomona with a chance. So that’s all I wanted.”

Capps reached the final round for the fifth time in 2026 thanks to round wins against Cruz Pedregon, No. 1 qualifier Jack Beckman and Austin Prock.

Doug Kalitta ensured the Top Fuel championship race didn’t end in Las Vegas, taking down Kalitta Motorsports teammate Shawn Langdon in the semifinal round and then winning the race for the fifth time this year with a stellar run of 3.658 at 338.60 in his 12,000-horsepower Mac Tools dragster to power past Pruett’s 5.751 at 124.89.

The championship remains a longshot, as Kalitta heads to Pomona 107 points behind Langdon, but he’ll get an opportunity to win back-to-back world titles and the third in the past four years thanks to Sunday’s brilliant performance.

He took down Will Smith, Justin Ashley and then Langdon, going 3.66 in back-to-back rounds against Ashley and Langdon to reach the final round. In the championship round against Pruett, Kalitta and his team were even better, delivering a classic performance to pick up his 64th career victory and fourth in Las Vegas.

Next up is Pomona, where Kalitta will try to replicate Sunday’s performance and hope for a little luck along the way.

“I have to hand it to my guys. They really had my car on a rail today, running 3.60s all day and .65 in the final,” Kalitta said. “We definitely had her hopped up good and you know the track is incredible out here. I guess that’s the kind of conditions that my car likes. Obviously Alan [Johnson, crew chief], just what can I say about him and Mac [Savage]? You know they they’re just really incredible. It’s a great privilege to be in the spot I am, driving this thing.

“It was definitely a sigh of relief to see that win light come on against Shawn, to finally to get by those guys. That was what I was hoping for, to get a shot at Shawn in the third round and hopefully beat him, and so it worked out well. I have to admit, [the championship] feels like a long shot, but anything can happen with points and a half at Pomona. Pomona is really one of my favorite places to race.”

Pruett reached her fourth final round of 2026 and the 29th in her career thanks to round wins against Tony Schumacher, Josh Hart and Antron Brown.

In Pro Stock, Dallas Glenn capped off his second straight flawless weekend with another dominant performance, stretching his points lead and picking up his sixth win of the season after going 6.587 at 206.26 in his RAD Torque Systems Chevrolet Camaro to hold off Troy Coughlin Jr. in the final round.

It is Glenn’s 27th career victory and the reigning world champion now holds a commanding 87-point lead over Matt Hartford headed to Pomona, where Glenn will look to close out another standout season and an incredible late-season surge.

Glenn entered the Dallas race 71 points back of Greg Stanfield but responded with two No. 1 qualifiers – including the world record – and two victories, while Stanfield fell in the opening round at both races. With his fourth victory in Vegas – and third in a row – he’s now on the cusp of a second straight world title. To reach the championship round, Glenn took Erica Enders and Hartford, delivering the quick run of the weekend in the finals against Coughlin.

“When [Greg Stanfield] lost first round of Dallas, it definitely caught our attention,” Glenn said. “Like we have a really good shot to make up a lot of ground. We knew we could really put a hurting on them. I didn’t know it was 87 [point lead], so that kind of makes me happy that it’s kind of close to that 90 mark. If I can get enough points in qualifying over Hartford, then maybe we can squeeze another round against him there, and that will kind of take a lot of the pressure off for Pomona.

“When we left Michigan [the first race of the Countdown to the Championship], we were definitely scratching our heads. We came home and we basically tore the car completely down and just checked everything out and started over from scratch. We’ve been working on it, and it’s been getting better every single race.”

Coughlin advanced to the final round for the third time in 2026 after defeating Stanfield, Shane Tucker and Greg Anderson.

Windy conditions pushed the Pro Stock Motorcycle final between Vance & Hines teammates Richard Gadson and Gaige Herrera to Pomona, setting up what could be a thriller at the finale. The final round will take place during the third qualifying session, which is slated for 1 p.m. PT on Saturday, Nov. 14.

Herrera, who was the No. 1 qualifier, went as quick as 6.752 at 200.05 in knocking off Chris Bostick, Clayton Howey and Joey Gladstone as he will try to track down his teammate and points leader at the In-N-Out Burger NHRA Finals.

Gadson, the reigning world champion, qualified second and knocked off John Hall, Angie Smith and Ryan Oehler. He’ll head to Pomona with a 55-point lead over Herrera, looking to clinch his second straight world championship.

The NHRA Mission Foods Drag Racing Series closes out its 75th anniversary season with the In-N-Out Burger NHRA Finals on Nov. 12-15 at In-N-Out Burger Pomona Dragstrip.


LAS VEGAS — Final finish order (1-16) at the 26th annual MOPAR NHRA Las Vegas Nationals powered by Dodge at The Strip at Las Vegas Motor Speedway. The race is the 19th of 20 events in the NHRA Mission Foods Drag Racing Series.

TOP FUEL:

  1. Doug Kalitta; 2. Leah Pruett; 3. Antron Brown; 4. Shawn Langdon; 5. Billy Torrence; 6. Tony Stewart; 7. Josh Hart; 8. Justin Ashley; 9. Maddi Gordon; 10. Clay Millican; 11. Will Smith; 12. Shawn Reed; 13. Cameron Ferre; 14. Chris Powers; 15. Spencer Massey; 16. Tony Schumacher.

FUNNY CAR:

  1. Jordan Vandergriff; 2. Ron Capps; 3. J.R. Todd; 4. Austin Prock; 5. Matt Hagan; 6. Jack

Beckman; 7. Hunter Green; 8. Spencer Hyde; 9. Chad Green; 10. Dave Richards; 11. Alexis DeJoria; 12. Cruz Pedregon; 13. Julie Nataas; 14. Daniel Wilkerson; 15. Paul Lee; 16. Jeff Diehl.

PRO STOCK:

  1. Dallas Glenn; 2. Troy Coughlin Jr.; 3. Greg Anderson; 4. Matt Hartford; 5. Cody Anderson; 6. Erica Enders; 7. Shane Tucker; 8. Deric Kramer; 9. Greg Stanfield; 10. Aaron Stanfield; 11. Matt Latino; 12. Eric Latino; 13. Jeg Coughlin; 14. Kenny Delco; 15. Alan Prusiensky; 16. Chris Vang.

LAS VEGAS — Sunday’s final results from the 26th annual MOPAR NHRA Las Vegas Nationals powered by Dodge at The Strip at Las Vegas Motor Speedway. The race is the 19th of 20 in the NHRA Mission Foods Drag Racing Series:

Top Fuel — Doug Kalitta, 3.658 seconds, 338.60 mph def. Leah Pruett, 5.751 seconds, 124.89 mph.

Funny Car — Jordan Vandergriff, Chevy Camaro, 3.873, 331.36 def. Ron Capps, Toyota GR Supra, 3.921, 335.15.

Pro Stock — Dallas Glenn, Chevy Camaro, 6.587, 206.26 def. Troy Coughlin Jr., Camaro, 6.604, 207.69.

Pro Modified — Justin Bond, Chevy Camaro, 5.660, 253.47 def. Mike Stavrinos, Camaro, 5.791, 230.69.

Stock Eliminator — Jeff Adkinson, Chevy Camaro, 9.437, 138.91 def. Justin Lamb, Chevy Copo, 9.625, 128.21.

Super Comp — Toby Payne, Dragster, 9.086, 158.76 def. Blu Hayball, Dragster, 9.196, 155.19.

LAS VEGAS — Final round-by-round results from the 26th annual MOPAR NHRA Las Vegas Nationals powered by Dodge at The Strip at Las Vegas Motor Speedway, the 19th of 20 events in the NHRA Mission Foods Drag Racing Series:

TOP FUEL:

ROUND ONE — Billy Torrence, 3.660, 340.65 def. Spencer Massey, 6.191, 101.36; Antron Brown, 3.690, 336.74 def. Maddi Gordon, 3.693, 340.82; Justin Ashley, 3.740, 326.32 def. Clay Millican, 3.699, 334.98; Josh Hart, 3.719, 338.77 def. Shawn Reed, 3.785, 316.38; Tony Stewart, 3.678, 340.13 def. Chris Powers, 4.305, 202.15; Shawn Langdon, 3.672, 330.31 def. Cameron Ferre, 4.025, 299.13; Doug Kalitta, 3.682, 333.25 def. Will Smith, 3.745, 333.00; Leah Pruett, 3.714, 332.26 def. Tony Schumacher, 11.729, 81.64;

QUARTERFINALS — Pruett, 3.687, 333.58 def. Hart, 3.681, 339.45; Kalitta, 3.664, 339.70 def. Ashley, 3.757, 313.37; Brown, 3.683, 336.32 def. Stewart, 3.678, 336.32; Langdon, 3.678, 335.48 def. Torrence, 3.675, 340.47;

SEMIFINALS — Pruett, 4.871, 223.76 def. Brown, 8.902, 84.38; Kalitta, 3.665, 334.15 def. Langdon, 11.147, 103.10;

FINAL — Kalitta, 3.658, 338.60 def. Pruett, 5.751, 124.89.

FUNNY CAR:

ROUND ONE — Ron Capps, Toyota GR Supra, 3.899, 332.18 def. Cruz Pedregon, Dodge Charger, 3.935, 322.58; J.R. Todd, GR Supra, 3.909, 332.75 def. Chad Green, Ford Mustang, 3.885, 320.66; Spencer Hyde, Mustang, 4.209, 316.67 def. Paul Lee, Charger, 5.008, 193.99; Jack Beckman, Chevy Camaro, 3.851, 329.67 def. Jeff Diehl, Toyota Camry, Foul – Centerline; Matt Hagan, Charger, 3.882, 332.18 def. Dave Richards, Mustang, 3.928, 329.10; Jordan Vandergriff, Camaro, 3.876, 324.28 def. Julie Nataas, GR Supra, 3.985, 323.50; Hunter Green, Charger, 3.923, 321.73 def. Alexis DeJoria, Camaro,

3.931, 289.88; Austin Prock, Mustang, 3.955, 319.29 def. Daniel Wilkerson, Mustang, 4.750, 170.13;

QUARTERFINALS — Prock, 3.888, 334.48 def. H. Green, 3.957, 320.81; Todd, 3.883, 336.40 def. Hagan, 3.890, 331.04; Capps, 3.874, 336.82 def. Beckman, 3.893, 317.42; Vandergriff, 3.912, 324.20 def. Hyde, 6.502, 103.54;

SEMIFINALS — Vandergriff, 3.911, 327.90 def. Todd, 4.525, 251.77; Capps, 4.430, 269.24 def. Prock, 4.667, 284.62;

FINAL — Vandergriff, 3.873, 331.36 def. Capps, 3.921, 335.15.

PRO STOCK:

ROUND ONE — Erica Enders, Chevy Camaro, 6.651, 205.63 def. Eric Latino, Camaro, Foul – Red Light; Cody Anderson, Camaro, 6.626, 206.04 def. Aaron Stanfield, Camaro, 6.633, 205.91; Troy Coughlin Jr., Camaro, 6.628, 205.88 def. Greg Stanfield, Camaro, 6.624, 205.22; Matt Hartford, Camaro, 6.644, 207.75 def. Kenny Delco, Camaro, 6.747, 203.61; Shane Tucker, Camaro, 22.464, 52.01 def. Matt Latino, Camaro, Foul – Red Light; Dallas Glenn, Camaro, 6.615, 206.04 def. Alan Prusiensky, Dodge Dart, Broke – No Show; Greg Anderson, Camaro, 6.621, 205.22 def. Chris Vang, Camaro, Broke; Deric Kramer, Camaro, 6.640, 206.04 def. Jeg Coughlin, Camaro, 6.649, 204.91;

QUARTERFINALS — Hartford, 6.637, 206.48 def. Kramer, Broke; Coughlin Jr., 6.651, 205.60 def. Tucker, 6.725, 205.01; G. Anderson, 6.613, 203.98 def. C. Anderson, 6.643, 206.23; Glenn, 6.610, 206.23 def. Enders, Foul – Red Light;

SEMIFINALS — Coughlin Jr., 6.627, 207.21 def. G. Anderson, 6.597, 205.76; Glenn, 6.611, 206.04 def. Hartford, 6.616, 206.10;

FINAL — Glenn, 6.587, 206.26 def. Coughlin Jr., 6.604, 207.69.

PRO STOCK MOTORCYCLE:

ROUND ONE — Clayton Howey, Buell, 6.865, 196.30 def. Malcolm Phillips Jr., Suzuki, 6.899, 195.96; Angie Smith, Buell, 6.833, 198.12 def. Chase Van Sant, Suzuki, Foul – Red Light; Steve Johnson, Suzuki, 6.931, 185.51 def. Geno Scali, Suzuki, 6.947, 194.66; Joey Gladstone, Buell, 6.874, 196.07 def. Marc Ingwersen, 6.938, 194.60; Matt Smith, Buell, 6.857, 197.74 def. Karen Stoffer, Suzuki, 6.972, 191.24; Ryan Oehler, 6.865, 197.05 def. GT Tonglet, Suzuki, 7.015, 194.63; Richard Gadson, Suzuki, 7.158, 186.33 def. John Hall, Buell, 7.860, 123.93; Gaige Herrera, Suzuki, 6.765, 199.79 def. Chris Bostick, Suzuki, 6.895, 195.11;

QUARTERFINALS — Oehler, 6.823, 198.03 def. Johnson, 6.828, 196.85; Gadson, 6.857, 194.72 def. A. Smith, 6.865, 199.08; Gladstone, 6.863, 196.93 def. M. Smith, 7.153, 158.32; Herrera, 6.752, 200.05 def. Howey, 6.890, 195.73;

SEMIFINALS — Gadson, 6.933, 174.48 def. Oehler, 8.484, 107.81; Herrera, 7.280, 181.96 def. Gladstone, 7.332, 180.09;

FINAL — Gadson vs. Herrera (to be completed at Pomona)

LAS VEGAS — Point standings (top 10) following the 26th annual MOPAR NHRA Las Vegas Nationals powered by Dodge at The Strip at Las Vegas Motor Speedway, the 19th of 20 events in the NHRA Mission Foods Drag Racing Series –

Top Fuel

  1. Shawn Langdon, 2,630; 2. Doug Kalitta, 2,523; 3. Antron Brown, 2,394; 4. Leah Pruett, 2,379; 5. Tony Stewart, 2,359; 6. (tie) Maddi Gordon, 2,293; Will Smith, 2,293; 8. Justin Ashley, 2,278; 9. Josh Hart, 2,254; 10. Billy Torrence, 2,250.

Funny Car

  1. Matt Hagan, 2,563; 2. Jordan Vandergriff, 2,524; 3. J.R. Todd, 2,459; 4. Austin Prock, 2,422; 5. Jack Beckman, 2,412; 6. Ron Capps, 2,408; 7. Alexis DeJoria, 2,314; 8. Daniel Wilkerson, 2,239; 9. Spencer Hyde, 2,204; 10. Chad Green, 2,187.

Pro Stock

  1. Dallas Glenn, 2,556; 2. Matt Hartford, 2,469; 3. Greg Stanfield, 2,457; 4. Greg Anderson, 2,437; 5. Troy Coughlin Jr., 2,425; 6. Cody Anderson, 2,303; 7. Aaron Stanfield, 2,282; 8. Jeg Coughlin, 2,280; 9. Matt Latino, 2,267; 10. Erica Enders, 2,260.

Pro Stock Motorcycle

  1. Richard Gadson, 2,579; 2. Gaige Herrera, 2,524; 3. Matt Smith, 2,446; 4. Ryan Oehler, 2,411; 5. Angie Smith, 2,340; 6. John Hall, 2,339; 7. Jianna Evaristo, 2,288; 8. Chase Van Sant, 2,274; 9. Steve Johnson, 2,228; 10. Clayton Howey, 2,211.

Wood Brothers Racing – Race Report: Martinsville Speedway

Event: Xfinity 500

Location: Martinsville Speedway, Ridgeway, Virginia

Date: Sunday, November 1, 2026

Start: 10th

Finish: 4th

Josh Berry and the No. 21 Motorcraft/Quick Lane Ford Mustang Dark Horse turned in a strong performance in Sunday’s Xfinity 500 at Martinsville Speedway, earning a fourth-place finish that propelled Berry to career highs in top-five and top-10 finishes in the NASCAR Cup Series.

With one race remaining in the 2026 season, Berry has recorded four top-five and 11 top-10 finishes, with an opportunity to add to those totals in next Sunday’s season finale at Homestead-Miami Speedway.

Both marks are the best for Wood Brothers Racing since 2014, when Ryan Blaney recorded four top-five and 14 top-10 finishes behind the wheel of the No. 21 Ford.

Berry started Sunday’s 500-lap race at the tight, half-mile Martinsville oval from the 10th position and quickly established himself as a contender for a strong finish.

Outside of green-flag pit stop cycles, Berry maintained a position inside the top 10 throughout the opening 130-lap Stage, ultimately finishing fifth to collect six valuable stage points.

The second Stage brought more of the same for Berry and the Motorcraft/Quick Lane team, as he continued to run among the top 10 before finishing seventh and adding four more stage points.

Berry and the No. 21 team saved their best for the final segment of the race. With just over 90 laps remaining, Berry worked his way into the top five and maintained that position through the closing laps, ultimately taking the checkered flag in fourth. The result marked his best finish since another fourth-place effort four races earlier at Charlotte Motor Speedway.

Following the race, Berry expressed his satisfaction with the team’s performance.

“It was really fun,” he said. “The car was really solid all day. We just needed a little bit of track position and needed to get up to the front a little sooner.”

Berry also expressed his appreciation for those supporting the No. 21 team.

“I just want to thank everybody at Wood Brothers and Team Penske, Ford Racing for everything they for us.”

Berry and the Motorcraft/Quick Lane team now turn their attention to next Sunday’s Cup Series Champions Race at Homestead-Miami Speedway, where they will look to close out the 2026 season with another strong performance.

NHRA LAS VEGAS NATIONALS: ELITE MOTORSPORTS RESULTS

NHRA LAS VEGAS NATIONALS:
ELITE MOTORSPORTS RESULTS

TROY COUGHLIN JR., JEGS Pro Stock Car
Qualifying: No. 11
6.661 seconds, 205.35 mph
E1: .000 RT, 6.628 at 205.888 def. Greg Stanfield .015, 6.624 at 205.22
E2: 6.651 at 206.60 def. Shane Tucker 6.725 at 205.01
Semis: .015 RT, 6.627 at 207.21 def. Greg Anderson .047, 6.597 at 205.76
Finals: 6.604 at 207.69 lost to Dallas Glenn 6.587 at 206.26
Unofficial Points Position: 5th

Quotes:

“God is good, that’s for sure. Man, we really wanted to finish today with this JEGS machine in the winners circle, just came up a little short in the final. I kind of missed it on the starting line and then grabbed the chip on the 1-2 gear change, which slowed us down. I’m not so sure that we could have got there as good as Dallas ran, but would have been a heck of a lot tighter. We’ll just have to keep getting better, keep putting the work in. I’m really proud of Kyle Bates, Kelly Murphy, Alex Laine, and Steven Hurley. I can’t say enough about them. They have this JEGS car ready to go for every round and that’s a feat in itself. It’s a lot of work, and every bit of credit is due to them.”

GREG STANFIELD, Janac Brothers Racing Pro Stock Car

Qualifying: No. 6
6.636 seconds, 205.01 mph
Bonus Qualifying Points: 5
Race Results: Lost to Troy Coughlin Jr.
Unofficial Points Position: 3rd

JEG COUGHLIN JR., JEGS.com Pro Stock Car

Qualifying: No. 12
6.661 seconds, 205.07 mph
Race Results: Lost to Deric Kramer
Unofficial Points Position: 8th

ERICA ENDERS, Johnson’s Horsepowered Garage / Melling Performance / R+L Carriers Pro Stock Car

Qualifying: No. 9

6.651 seconds at 205.44 mph

Race Results: Beat Eric Latino; Lost to Dallas Glenn

Unofficial Points Position: 10th

AARON STANFIELD, Johnson’s Horsepowered Garage / Melling Performance / Janac Brothers Racing Pro Stock Car

Qualifying: No. 10
6.659 seconds, 204.51 mph
Race Results: Lost to Cody Anderson
Unofficial Points Position: 7th

TONY STEWART, R+L Carriers Top Fuel dragster

Qualifying: No. 2
3.676 seconds, 339.28 mph
Bonus Qualifying Points: 8
Race Results: Beat Chris Powers; Lost to Antron Brown
Unofficial Points Position: 5th

Modern Car Key Technology Explained: Transponders, Immobilisers, and the Challenges of Replacing Vehicle Keys

Modern vehicle security has evolved considerably over the past two decades. What was once a relatively straightforward mechanical key has developed into a sophisticated electronic system involving transponder chips, immobilizers, remote central locking and keyless entry technology.

For vehicle owners, these developments offer improved security and convenience. However, they have also made car key replacement considerably more technical, particularly when all keys have been lost or an electronic fault prevents a vehicle from recognising its key.

Understanding how modern car keys work, and why specialist equipment is required to replace and programme them, provides useful insight into an increasingly important part of the automotive industry.

How Modern Car Keys Have Evolved

Traditional vehicle keys relied primarily on mechanical cutting. The physical shape of the blade matched the vehicle’s lock, allowing the driver to unlock the doors and operate the ignition.

As vehicle security developed, manufacturers introduced electronic immobiliser systems to make unauthorised vehicle starting more difficult.

These systems changed the role of the car key. Rather than simply providing mechanical access, the key also needed to communicate electronically with the vehicle.

Today, many vehicles use a combination of mechanical security, electronic identification and encrypted communication. The exact arrangement varies between manufacturers, models and production years.

What Is a Transponder Key?

A transponder key contains a small electronic chip that communicates with the vehicle’s immobiliser system.

When the key is used, the vehicle checks whether the electronic identification is recognised. If the required authorisation is received, the immobiliser permits the engine to start.

If the vehicle does not recognise the transponder, the engine may crank without starting, or the vehicle may prevent the starting process altogether, depending on its design.

This is why simply cutting a replacement key blade is not always sufficient.

A correctly cut key may operate the mechanical locks, but the electronic transponder must also be compatible and programmed or authorised where required.

Understanding Vehicle Immobiliser Systems

An immobiliser is an electronic security feature designed to prevent an unauthorised key from starting a vehicle.

Depending on the vehicle, the system may communicate with several electronic components, including the engine control unit, body control module, immobiliser module and keyless entry system.

These components work together to verify the key and authorise vehicle operation.

When a key is lost, damaged or no longer recognised, diagnosing the problem can require more than simply supplying another key.

A specialist automotive locksmith needs to establish whether the issue relates to the key itself, its programming, the vehicle’s immobiliser system or another electronic component.

Smart Keys and Proximity Entry Systems

Many newer vehicles use proximity-based key systems.

Instead of inserting a key into an ignition barrel, the driver can unlock the vehicle and start the engine while the electronic key remains nearby.

These systems offer convenience, but replacement can be more involved than traditional key cutting.

The replacement key must be suitable for the vehicle’s specific system and correctly configured. Depending on the manufacturer, this can involve specialist diagnostic equipment, security authorisation and electronic programming procedures.

Not every replacement key is compatible with every vehicle, even when the remote fob looks almost identical.

Why Modern Car Key Replacement Requires Specialist Equipment

Automotive locksmithing has become a specialist technical discipline.

Modern replacement keys may require a combination of:

  • Accurate mechanical key cutting.
  • Transponder identification and programming.
  • Remote control synchronisation.
  • Proximity key configuration.
  • Immobiliser communication.
  • Manufacturer-specific diagnostic procedures.

Professional automotive locksmiths use specialist key-cutting machines, programming tools and diagnostic equipment to work with different vehicle security systems.

The correct procedure depends on the manufacturer, model, year and immobiliser generation.

This is particularly important when dealing with vehicles for which every original key has been lost. An all-keys-lost situation can require additional security procedures compared with simply programming a spare key when an existing working key is available.

What Happens When All Car Keys Are Lost?

Losing every key to a vehicle can be stressful, particularly when the vehicle is needed for work or everyday transport.

The first step is identifying the vehicle accurately, including its make, model, year and relevant security system.

A specialist automotive locksmith can then establish the appropriate replacement procedure.

Depending on the vehicle, the process may involve:

  1. Verifying vehicle ownership and authorisation.
  2. Identifying the existing key and immobiliser system.
  3. Establishing the correct replacement key specification.
  4. Cutting the mechanical key where applicable.
  5. Programming or configuring the electronic key.
  6. Testing the completed key and relevant functions.

The exact process varies significantly between vehicles. Some systems are relatively straightforward, while others require more advanced diagnostic and programming procedures.

Using a professional with suitable vehicle-specific equipment and experience is important when dealing with modern electronic security systems.

Choosing a Specialist Automotive Locksmith

Not all locksmith services offer the same capabilities.

Traditional locksmithing and automotive locksmithing are different disciplines, and modern vehicle key replacement often requires dedicated equipment and technical knowledge.

When choosing an automotive locksmith, vehicle owners should consider:

  • Experience with their particular vehicle manufacturer.
  • Access to appropriate key programming equipment.
  • Ability to deal with all-keys-lost situations.
  • Transparent pricing before work begins.
  • Appropriate insurance and professional credentials.
  • Whether the service is genuinely mobile.

It is also worth asking whether the locksmith can supply a complete replacement key, rather than simply cutting a mechanical blade.

A properly equipped mobile automotive locksmith can often carry out replacement and programming work at the vehicle’s location, avoiding the need to arrange transport to a dealership.

Mobile Automotive Locksmith Services in Crawley, Mid Sussex and East Surrey

As vehicle key technology continues to develop, specialist mobile automotive locksmith services have become increasingly important to motorists.

247 Auto Locksmith provides mobile automotive locksmith assistance covering Crawley, Mid Sussex and East Surrey.

Its services include replacement car keys, spare keys, transponder programming, proximity keys, vehicle unlocking and specialist ignition-related work.

By combining key-cutting equipment, diagnostic technology and automotive programming tools, specialist locksmiths can help vehicle owners deal with a range of key and vehicle security problems.

For motorists requiring professional car key replacement services, 247 Auto Locksmith provides mobile automotive locksmith assistance across Crawley, Mid Sussex and East Surrey. From replacement transponder keys and proximity fobs to specialist key programming, the business helps motorists get back on the road without the inconvenience of arranging a dealership visit.

Exploring a Race-Car Livery Reveal with AI Video Concepts

Photo by ravencrow BI on Pexels

A race-car livery has to work as a moving composition, not just a flat drawing. Stripes that look balanced on a design sheet can compete with a number panel or disappear into reflections when seen from another angle. For early visual exploration, seedance 3.0 offers text-to-video and image-to-video starting points that can help a designer discuss the mood of a proposed car reveal. These experiments are creative previews, rather than engineering models or footage of an actual race car.

That distinction gives the exercise a useful boundary. A generated clip can suggest how a colour palette feels under changing light, or whether a reveal should be quiet and deliberate or sharp and energetic. It cannot establish whether a graphic will fit a real body panel, meet series requirements, or reproduce a sponsor’s artwork accurately. Those decisions still belong to the team’s design and production process.

What the reveal needs to communicate

Imagine a fictional club-racing team developing a navy-and-orange design. The first question is not which dramatic camera move to request. It is what the audience should remember: the orange nose, a continuous side stripe, or the overall contrast between the two colours. A reveal that tries to emphasise every surface can make the design harder to recognise.

Choose one visual idea for each shot. A close view can introduce a colour or surface texture. A wider view can reveal the relationship between the bonnet, side panels, and rear bodywork. A final still can show the complete approved design. This structure gives each image a purpose and leaves room for the actual team information.

Build from an approved reference

If the team already has a rendered concept, use a version that clearly shows the intended shape and major colour areas. Keep an untouched master for comparison. The generated preview should be checked against that reference for changes in body proportions, wheel placement, stripes, and small details. A convincing-looking frame is not necessarily a faithful representation of the design.

When the exact livery matters, a conventional three-dimensional render or controlled shoot may be the better final asset. An AI video sketch can still help the team choose the presentation style before committing to that production. Its role is to make creative choices discussable, not to replace a technical drawing or a designer’s approval.

Protect the identity of the car

Numbers, sponsor marks, and team lettering carry specific meaning. They should be checked individually, not treated as background decoration. If generated imagery distorts them, an editor can use an approved still, a separate graphic, or a different shot rather than publishing an approximation. Any sponsor assets used in the project should be cleared through the team’s normal approval process.

A fictional concept should also be presented as fictional. It should not imply that a real manufacturer, driver, championship, or sponsor has endorsed it. Keeping the example independent of existing teams gives designers room to experiment without creating confusion about a genuine announcement.

Design for the channel where fans will watch

A wide presentation on a team website and a vertical social clip frame the car differently. Cropping a wide shot can cut off the nose, rear wing, or number panel. Review the actual crop early, leaving enough room around the features that need to stay visible. A simpler composition often works better than squeezing the whole design into a narrow frame.

The same review should include the title and release information. Add exact names and dates during editing so that they remain consistent across versions. Watch once without sound and once on a small screen. Fans should still be able to understand what is being revealed and whether they are seeing a concept or a finished car.

The strongest livery reveal gives the design room to speak. Motion, lighting, and editing should direct attention to the choices the team has made. Used as an early sketching method, AI video can help settle those presentation choices; the final publication should remain anchored to the approved artwork and the real car it represents.

2012 Ford Flex Problems Every Owner Should Know and How to Fix Them

The 2012 Ford Flex is a boxy seven-seat crossover that still turns heads. It rides well, holds a lot of cargo, and the EcoBoost version still feels quick. But this Flex is now well over a decade old, and age brings repairs.

Some of those repairs are cheap. Others turn into big bills if you miss the early signs. Below are the problems owners report most, what to look for, and how a good Ford Flex manual helps with each one.

A Quick Look at the 2012 Ford Flex

The 2012 Flex came in SE, SEL, Limited, and Titanium trims. Every version used a 3.5-liter V6 and a six-speed automatic. Here is how the two engines compare.

EnginePowerTorqueTransmissionDrive
3.5L Ti-VCT V6262 hp248 lb-ft6F50 six-speed automaticFWD or AWD
3.5L EcoBoost twin-turbo V6355 hp350 lb-ft6F55 six-speed automaticAWD only

For 2012, Ford dropped the EcoBoost from the SEL trim. It stayed on the Limited and Titanium. Properly equipped, the Flex tows up to 4,500 pounds and offers 83.2 cubic feet of cargo space.

Know which engine and drivetrain you have before you start any repair. Several of the problems below only affect one setup.

1. Internal Water Pump Failure

This is the most serious problem on the Flex. Ford placed the water pump inside the engine, behind the timing cover. The timing chain drives it.

When the pump seal wears out, coolant can leak into the engine oil. Coolant thins the oil and washes away lubrication. That speeds up timing chain wear and can ruin the engine if nobody catches it.

Owners of both the base V6 and the EcoBoost have reported this failure. Watch for these signs:

  • Coolant level drops but you see no puddle
  • Milky or tan oil on the dipstick or under the oil cap
  • A sweet coolant smell or a wet spot near the passenger side of the engine
  • The temperature gauge climbing or the engine overheating
  • Timing-related check engine codes such as P0016 or P0018

If you see milky oil or the engine overheats, stop driving. A few more miles can turn a pump job into an engine swap.

The repair is big because the timing cover must come off. It is one of the longest jobs on this vehicle and often keeps the Flex in the shop for most of a day or more. Because the work is so deep, it makes sense to replace the timing chain, guides and tensioners at the same time.

The factory service manual shows the timing marks, the camshaft holding steps and the bolt torque order for the timing cover. Getting any of those wrong can bend valves or cause a new leak.

2. Power Transfer Unit Leaks on AWD Models

The power transfer unit, or PTU, is the small gearbox that sends power from the transmission to the rear wheels. It sits right next to the exhaust. That heat breaks down the gear oil over time and hardens the seals.

Owners describe thick black fluid leaking from the PTU and a burning gear oil smell at stoplights. Ford also issued service guidance on a seal leak between the PTU and the transmission case on earlier Flex models.

Signs of a PTU problem:

  • Burning oil smell, especially after a highway drive
  • Light smoke from the passenger side of the engine bay
  • Drips under the front of the vehicle
  • A whine or grinding noise that rises with speed
  • AWD that feels like it stopped working

A leaking seal is a small job. A PTU that runs dry is not. Owners who caught leaks early often got away with new seals and fresh fluid. Changing the PTU fluid now and then is a cheap habit many owners use to stretch its life.

The service manual covers PTU service, Active Torque Coupling diagnostics, and the coupling barcode programming step that follows some AWD repairs.

3. Power Steering Loss on EcoBoost Models

EcoBoost versions of the 2012 Flex use electric power steering instead of a hydraulic pump. A sensor fault in the steering motor can shut off the power assist. When that happens, the wheel suddenly gets very heavy, mostly at low speeds.

Ford recalled 2011 and 2012 EcoBoost Flex models for this in June 2015. Dealers check the power steering control module for fault codes and update its software. If they find loss of assist codes, they replace the steering gear free of charge.

Watch for a “power steering assist fault” message or a steering wheel that turns stiff without warning. Some owners say the problem came back years later, or that their VIN was not part of the recall. If your Flex shows these signs, get it checked before you drive it again.

The steering section of the factory manual explains how to read steering module codes with a scan tool and how to test the system before you replace expensive parts.

4. Grinding Brakes and Sticking Calipers

Front brake grinding is one of the most common 2012 Flex complaints. Sticking calipers come up often too. A heavy three-row crossover is hard on brakes, and older calipers can seize.

Signs:

  • Grinding or grunting from the front at low speed
  • The Flex pulls to one side when you brake
  • One wheel feels much hotter than the others after a drive
  • Uneven pad wear
  • ABS or stability control warning lights

Brakes are a safe place for many owners to start doing their own work. The factory manual lists the caliper bracket torque, the pad wear limits and the ABS and stability control diagnostic steps. Never guess on brake bolt torque.

5. Wheel Bearings, HVAC Blend Doors and Other Wear Items

Across every model year, owners most often report worn wheel bearings, failed HVAC blend door motors, sticking brake calipers and worn tie rod ends. None of these are rare for a heavy crossover with high miles.

  • Wheel bearing: a hum or growl that gets louder with speed and changes when you turn
  • Blend door motor: a clicking noise behind the dash, or air coming from the wrong vents
  • Tie rod ends: loose steering, clunks over bumps, or uneven tire wear
  • Serpentine belt: squeaks at startup; some owners replaced belts and tensioners early

Recalls on the 2012 Ford Flex

The 2012 Flex has two federal safety recalls. Recall repairs are free at any Ford dealer, no matter how old the vehicle is.

RecallDateProblemFix
16V247000 (Ford 16C06)April 2016Driver frontal airbag may not inflate properly in the second stage of a high-speed crashDealer inspects and replaces the driver air bag module if needed
15V340000 (Ford 15S18)June 2015EcoBoost models only: a steering motor sensor fault can shut off power steering assistModule check, software update, steering gear replacement if needed

Run your 17-digit VIN through the free federal recall lookup or call a Ford dealer. Used vehicles often change hands with open recalls that nobody fixed.

Why a Factory Manual Matters for an Older Flex

The Flex has a tight engine bay and an AWD system that works differently from a truck. That pushes labor hours up. Even if you never pick up a wrench, knowing the real repair steps helps you judge a shop quote.

A generic repair book covers many models at once and skips details. A factory-level Ford Flex manual is written for this exact vehicle. The 2012 edition runs 6,402 pages. It covers both V6 engines, both six-speed automatics, FWD and AWD, plus wiring diagrams, torque specs, scan tool diagnostics, and body repair.

When you shop for a Ford Flex manual, check these points:

  1. It matches your exact model year
  2. It covers your engine and your drivetrain
  3. It includes full wiring diagrams, not just a few pages
  4. The text is searchable, so you can jump to a part name or code
  5. It opens on a phone or tablet you can keep in the garage

Simple Habits That Prevent Big Repair Bills

  • Check the coolant level once a month and note any drop
  • Look at the oil color every time you check the level
  • Change the oil on time; long oil intervals are linked to timing chain wear on this engine
  • Look under the front of the Flex for drips after you park
  • On AWD models, sniff for burning oil after highway drives
  • Run your VIN for open recalls once a year
  • Keep a simple log of every part you replace

Keep your Ford Flex manual on your phone so the right procedure is with you when a warning light comes on.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the 2012 Ford Flex reliable?
It is a solid family hauler with a comfortable ride. Owners filed fewer complaints for 2012 than for the 2009 to 2011 models. The water pump and PTU still need watching as the miles add up.

Does the EcoBoost Flex have the water pump problem too?
Yes. Owners of both the base 3.5-liter V6 and the EcoBoost have reported internal water pump failures. Check the oil and coolant often on either engine.

What transmission fluid does the 2012 Flex use?
Both automatics use Mercon LV. Check the factory manual for the exact level check procedure, since it is done with the engine running at a set temperature.

Can I replace the water pump at home?
It is possible with the right tools, a lift, and plenty of experience. Most owners leave it to a shop because of the timing work involved.

Will a 2012 manual work for a 2013 Flex?
Not fully. The Flex got a refresh for 2013 with styling and equipment changes. Always match the manual to your model year.

Final Thoughts

The 2012 Ford Flex can keep going for a long time if you catch problems early. Watch the coolant and oil closely, listen for PTU and brake noises, and clear any open recalls. With the right information on hand, most repairs stay small and predictable.

Heavy-Duty Industrial Tyres: How Fleets Maximize Tread Life and Uptime

Photo by Jacob Moore on Pexels

For material handling facilities, construction yards, and modern agricultural operations, tyres are far more than consumable rubber—they are the critical interface determining equipment uptime, operational safety, and total cost of ownership (TCO). Whether managing warehouse logistics with forklift trucks, navigating harsh demolition terrain with skid steer loaders, executing high-elevation maintenance via scissor lifts, or operating heavy machinery in wet agricultural fields, unexpected tyre failure remains a primary driver of costly operational delays.

Selecting the right tyre construction and compound grade requires balancing specific application demands against severe environmental stresses.

1. Forklift Operations: Solid vs. Pneumatic Tyres

In high-intensity warehouse and manufacturing environments, puncture resistance is paramount. Forklift operations typically choose between pneumatic and solid (cushion or resilient) tyres:

  • Pneumatic Tyres: Best suited for outdoor yards with uneven gravel or asphalt where shock absorption is essential to protect the equipment chassis and fragile cargo.
  • Solid Resilient Tyres: Built with three-stage natural rubber compounding—a durable tread layer for abrasion resistance, a center cushioning compound to dissipate heat buildup, and a steel wire-reinforced base to ensure absolute rim grip without slippage. For indoor facilities where floor hygiene is regulated, non-marking solid compounds eliminate black carbon friction marks entirely.

2. Skid Steer Loaders: Navigating Severe Abrasive Ground

Skid steer loaders impose extreme lateral scrubbing forces during zero-turn maneuvering. Standard pneumatic pneumatic skid steer tyres are vulnerable to sidewall punctures from rebar, jagged concrete, and scrap iron in demolition zones.

To maximize lifespan, fleet managers are increasingly adopting severe-duty, extra-deep tread patterns (L4 and L5 equivalents) featuring reinforced rim guards and cut-resistant compounding. Where total flat-proofing is required, aperture solid skid steer tyres provide the puncture immunity of solid rubber while built-in sidewall apertures preserve driver comfort and suspension longevity.

3. Scissor Lifts and Aerial Work Platforms: Precision Stability and Non-Marking Demands

Aerial work platforms (AWPs) and scissor lifts demand unwavering lateral stability at extended heights. Puncture failure while elevated represents a severe safety hazard; hence, scissor lifts almost universally mandate solid, high-load non-marking rubber wheels.

Key selection criteria include:

  • Low-rolling resistance compounds that preserve battery life in electric access platforms.
  • Premium synthetic polymer blends that leave no residue on finished epoxy or polished concrete floors.
  • High static load capacities to eliminate tyre squirm during elevated platform operation.

4. Agricultural Tyres: Soil Compaction and Traction Efficiency

In modern agricultural machinery, preserving soil structure while maximizing drawbar pull requires advanced radial and high-traction bias-ply tyre engineering. Deep, self-cleaning curved lugs provide forward bite in muddy topsoils, while wide footprint distributions reduce soil compaction to protect crop root systems. Flexible sidewall casing technology allows tractors and implements to run at optimized inflation pressures, lowering fuel consumption during heavy tilling.

Direct Factory Sourcing: The Quality and Compounding Equation

Behind every high-performance industrial and off-highway tyre is the precision of raw material sourcing and curing technology. High percentages of virgin natural rubber, premium carbon black dispersion, and automated vulcanization ensure tyres resist premature chunking, internal heat degradation, and tread separation.

Global equipment operators and parts distributors seeking long-term reliability often partner directly with specialized manufacturers. For high-grade material handling and agricultural solutions, Excel Tyres stands out as a dedicated China factory-direct producer specializing in forklift solid tyres, severe-duty skid steer tyres, non-marking aerial platform wheels, and agricultural tyres engineered to meet demanding international OEM specifications.

By aligning tyre tread patterns, rubber compounding grades, and duty-cycle ratings to specific site conditions, fleet managers can significantly lower replacement frequency, protect operator safety, and ensure seamless industrial productivity.

How Speedway Fans Can Get More From Race Night

A good speedway night has a way of pulling you in. The lights come on, the shale is worked over, riders roll out for the parade and, before long, four bikes are heading into turn one with barely a gap between them.

But getting more from speedway isn’t only about watching the heats. A little preparation makes the whole evening more enjoyable, whether you’ve followed your club for years or you’re still learning who rides at number five.

Here’s how to make race night feel less like a quick visit to the track and more like a proper part of your week.

Put together a fixture plan, not just a list of dates

It’s easy to spot the big local derby or a meeting against title rivals, but the quieter fixtures can be just as worthwhile. They often bring different storylines: a returning former rider, a new signing finding their feet, or a reserve getting a chance to change the shape of a meeting.

At the start of the season, take ten minutes to save your club’s fixture list somewhere useful. A calendar on your phone is ideal, particularly if you add a reminder a day or two beforehand.

Keep an eye on:

  • Start times, as some meetings begin earlier or later than the usual slot
  • Cup and play-off dates, which can move around as results develop
  • Travel time, especially for away trips on weekday evenings
  • Weather forecasts, because rain can affect track preparation or force a postponement
  • Club updates, as rearranged fixtures are sometimes confirmed at short notice

Speedway’s outdoor setting is part of its charm, but British weather doesn’t always play along. It’s worth checking official club channels on the day of the meeting rather than relying on an old fixture graphic shared weeks earlier.

For an away night, I find it helps to have a simple backup plan. Know the route, check parking information, and look up whether the venue accepts cards at the gate or food outlets. If weather is unsettled, pack a waterproof layer and footwear you don’t mind getting dusty. A speedway track can be breezy even when the rest of the day has felt mild.

The race card tells you more than the running order

A programme is one of the best ways to follow a meeting properly. It gives you the line-ups, heat schedule and rider numbers, but it also helps you understand what may happen before tapes rise.

Speedway is a specialist form of motorcycle racing. Riders compete on oval tracks, usually over four anti-clockwise laps, using machines with a single gear and no brakes. That unusual combination is part of what makes the sport so compelling. For more background on the discipline, Motorcycle speedway on Wikipedia provides a handy overview.

When you’re reading the race card, look beyond the names.

Check the team news

A late injury, a guest rider or a rider-replacement arrangement can change a meeting completely. It may affect which heats feel strongest for each side, and it can alter a captain’s options later in the evening.

If a club has announced changes before the meeting, compare them with the programme. It gives you a clearer sense of where a side might be stretched and where its depth lies.

Look at recent form, but keep it in perspective

Form matters, of course, though speedway is wonderfully unpredictable. A rider may have had a difficult away meeting on a circuit that doesn’t suit them, then look completely at home on their own track two nights later.

A few useful questions are:

  • Has the rider scored well at this venue before?
  • Are they coming into the meeting after a busy run of fixtures?
  • Is this their first appearance back from injury?
  • Have they changed equipment or settled into a new team role?
  • Do they usually start sharply from the gate, or build speed as the race develops?

The more meetings you attend, the more you’ll notice the little patterns. Some riders read a developing race brilliantly. Others are particularly strong from specific starting positions. That’s the sort of detail that gives a heat extra texture.

Watch the track as the meeting goes on

Track conditions are a huge part of speedway. A freshly prepared surface may offer one set of challenges, while later heats can produce different racing lines and more opportunity for passing.

You don’t need to be a track expert to notice changes. Watch where riders are finding grip. Are they hugging the inside kerb, carrying momentum around the outside, or switching lines halfway through a bend? Those choices often explain far more than the final result alone.

Speedway basics that make every heat easier to follow

If you’re new to the sport, the pace can feel relentless. Four laps disappear in moments, and the score can swing rapidly across a few heats. Once you know the basics, though, it becomes very easy to follow.

How the scoring works

In a standard four-rider heat, points are usually awarded as follows:

  • 3 points for first place
  • 2 points for second
  • 1 point for third
  • 0 points for fourth or a retirement

At team level, a heat can finish 5-1, 4-2 or 3-3, depending on where each side’s riders cross the line. The scoreboard may look complicated at first, but it soon becomes second nature.

A 5-1 is especially significant because it puts both riders from one team ahead of both opponents. You’ll hear plenty of noise when the home pair are working together to protect that advantage.

Tactical decisions add another layer

Depending on the competition and regulations in use, team managers can have tactical options available when their side falls behind. These may include changing who takes a ride or using a designated tactical opportunity.

The exact rules can vary between competitions and seasons, so it’s sensible to check the official regulations or ask a regular supporter if you’re unsure. That’s not a weakness, either. Speedway has plenty of knowledgeable people who are usually happy to explain a rule between heats.

A few simple race-night manners go a long way

Speedway crowds are passionate, and a bit of friendly debate is part of the evening. Still, everyone gets more from it when the atmosphere stays respectful.

A few easy habits help:

  • Let people return to their viewing spot between heats where possible.
  • Keep walkways clear, especially around busy terraces.
  • Follow steward instructions and stay behind barriers.
  • Give riders space when they’re moving through public areas.
  • Remember that visiting supporters are there for the same reason you are, to back their team.

Cheering hard for your club is part of the deal. Treating others decently is too.

Make the most of being at the venue

There’s something very different about watching speedway in person. You hear the engines, feel the change in atmosphere before a key heat and catch the conversations that never make it into a result graphic.

Arriving a little earlier can improve the whole night. You’ve got time to find the entrance, pick a viewing area and take in the pre-meeting activity without rushing.

Finding your best place to watch

There’s no single perfect spot. Some supporters prefer the start and finish line, where you can see gating and the scoreboard clearly. Others like standing near the bends, where the racing lines and passes can be easier to appreciate.

If it’s your first visit, walk a short stretch of the terrace after the early heats. You may find a corner that gives you a much better view of how riders set up overtakes.

Do check the venue rules before moving around, particularly where reserved seating or restricted areas apply.

Practical bits that are easy to overlook

A few small preparations can save hassle:

  • Bring a warm layer, even in summer.
  • Keep a waterproof close by if rain is forecast.
  • Check accessibility arrangements with the club before travelling.
  • Look at food, parking and admission information in advance.
  • Agree a meeting point with your group in case you get separated.

For supporters attending with family members, it’s useful to choose a spot with a clear view, room to stand comfortably and easy access to facilities. Ear protection may also be appropriate for anyone who finds engine noise uncomfortable.

Back the club culture, not just the scoreline

Local clubs rely on the people who turn up, volunteer, run refreshment kiosks, sell programmes and welcome newcomers. Buying a programme, saying hello to a volunteer, or visiting a supporters’ stall is a simple way to feel more connected.

Speedway grounds often have character in abundance. Embrace it. The regulars who know every rider’s history are part of what makes the sport feel like a community rather than a screen-based result.

Keep the meeting going during the week

Race night doesn’t have to end when the final heat finishes. Between meetings, there’s plenty to follow without getting buried in noise.

Start with official club websites and social accounts for confirmed results, injury updates, fixture changes and rider news. National and regional speedway outlets can add previews, interviews and broader context, while rider profiles are often a great way to understand the people behind the race jackets.

A useful weekly routine might look like this:

  1. Read the club’s match report after the meeting.
  2. Check the latest fixture news midweek.
  3. Watch for team updates and declared line-ups.
  4. Read a preview before travelling to the next meeting.
  5. Compare your own impressions with the result afterwards.

That final point matters. Were you right about which rider looked strongest on the changing track? Did a key heat turn on a start, a tactical decision or a brave outside line? Following those details makes the next meeting even more rewarding.

18+ Entertainment

Commercial Feature. This section is not SpeedwayMedia editorial and is unrelated to speedway results, team performance or club endorsement.

Online casino entertainment is for adults aged 18 and over only. If you choose to take part, read the applicable promotion terms and conditions before participating, and use any available account controls that suit your circumstances.

Explore Bally Casino Prize Play

For independent information and support around safer gambling, visit GambleAware.

The best speedway evenings are rarely only about the final score. They’re about spotting the track changes, recognizing a rider’s smart move in traffic, chatting over a close heat and feeling part of a club’s regular crowd.

Bring a bit of curiosity, arrive prepared, and keep an eye on the details. Before long, you’ll be reading a race card with confidence and looking forward to the next set of tapes going up.

What Formula 1 Fans Should Know About Sports Bets

Formula 1 combines high-speed competition, technical precision, and strategic decisions that can change the direction of a race within seconds. For American fans interested in sports betting, the championship offers several markets that reflect different aspects of the action, from qualifying performance to the final finishing order.

Understanding how these markets work requires more than recognizing the fastest drivers. Circuit characteristics, team performance, weather conditions, and race strategy all contribute to the changing competitive picture. Knowing what each betting option represents helps fans follow Formula 1 with a clearer understanding of the factors behind the odds.

Understanding Formula 1 Betting Markets

Formula 1 offers several betting markets beyond selecting the driver who finishes first. Each market focuses on a different part of the competition, allowing fans to explore outcomes related to individual drivers, teams, and race results.

FanDuel Sports bets, for example, provide examples of how motorsports markets are organized, although available selections may vary by event and location. Understanding these categories helps explain how different race scenarios are represented through betting odds.

Common Formula 1 markets include:

  • Race Winner: The driver recognized as the winner under the sportsbook’s settlement rules.
  • Podium Finish: Whether a driver places in the top three according to the classification used for settlement.
  • Head-to-Head: Which of two named drivers ranks higher, with specific rules governing retirements, nonstarters, and disqualifications.
  • Top Six Finish: Whether a driver places within the top six under the applicable market rules.

Check the classification and settlement cutoff specified by the operator. For example, Betfair’s published Formula 1 rules use the official FIA classification at the podium presentation and disregard subsequent penalties or disqualifications. If both drivers retire, its race head-to-head rules also use that classification. Other operators may apply different conditions.

How Betting Odds Reflect Expectations

Formula 1 odds represent the implied probability of different outcomes while also incorporating the sportsbook’s margin. Shorter odds generally indicate a higher implied probability, while longer odds suggest an outcome is considered less likely.

For example, +150 converts to an implied probability of 40%, while +600 converts to approximately 14.3%. A successful $20 cash wager would earn $30 profit at +150 or $120 at +600, returning $50 or $140 including the stake. These percentages describe the quoted prices, not independently verified chances of winning.

Several developments can affect these prices throughout a Grand Prix weekend:

  • Practice Performance: Lap times and longer runs offer context, but different fuel loads, tire compounds, track conditions, and testing programs limit direct comparisons.
  • Qualifying Results: Starting positions can change expectations, particularly on circuits where overtaking is difficult.
  • Technical Updates: New components or adjustments may alter a team’s performance.
  • Weather Forecasts: Changing conditions can affect tire choices, driving demands, and race preparation.

Odds may also respond to penalties, reliability concerns, and driver availability, although anticipated developments may already be reflected in the price. Recognizing why odds moved does not establish that the updated selection offers value.

Why Circuit Characteristics Matter

Every Formula 1 circuit presents different demands, making track characteristics an important part of understanding race expectations. Some venues reward straight-line speed, while others emphasize cornering performance, tire management, and precise driving.

High-Speed Circuits

Tracks with long straights and fast corners place considerable emphasis on aerodynamic efficiency and engine performance. Teams must balance speed with sufficient stability through demanding sections.

Circuits such as Monza illustrate how vehicle characteristics can shape the competitive order, particularly when small differences in straight-line performance become significant.

Street Circuits

Street circuits often feature narrow sections, limited runoff areas, and fewer overtaking opportunities. Qualifying positions can carry additional importance because moving through the field may prove difficult. Monaco is a familiar example, where track position and precise driving frequently become central to race strategy.

Technical Circuits

Layouts featuring varied corner speeds, elevation changes, and demanding braking zones test several aspects of vehicle performance. Teams must find a setup that balances competing requirements. Comparing circuit characteristics with previous performances provides context for understanding why competitive expectations differ between Grand Prix weekends.

The Importance of Qualifying and Strategy

Grand Prix qualifying normally establishes the starting order, subject to grid penalties, pit-lane starts, and other adjustments. A driver qualifying third may therefore start lower. Check the final starting grid rather than assuming it matches the qualifying classification, especially where overtaking opportunities are limited.

Pirelli nominates three slick compounds for each weekend, designated soft, medium, and hard. Softer slicks generally prioritize grip over durability, while harder alternatives can support longer stints. Intermediate and full-wet tires serve wet conditions. In an ordinary dry Grand Prix, drivers must use at least two different slick compounds, so tire strategy also involves mandatory requirements.

Safety cars introduce another strategic element by reducing gaps between competitors and creating opportunities for pit stops. Their appearance can change the timing of planned stops and affect track position.

These factors explain why qualifying pace and race pace are not always identical. A driver who performs exceptionally over one lap may face different challenges across an entire Grand Prix.

Following the Full Race Weekend

Formula 1 weekends provide several opportunities to observe how teams and drivers perform before the main event. Each session contributes different information, making the weekend’s progression useful for understanding competitive expectations.

Practice sessions allow teams to evaluate car setups, tire behavior, and performance over different distances. While headline lap times attract attention, they do not always reveal the complete picture because teams may use different fuel loads and testing programs.

Qualifying provides a clearer comparison of single-lap speed, although traffic, changing conditions, and track evolution can still affect results. Sprint weekends introduce a different schedule, with an additional competitive session that may provide further context.

During the Grand Prix, live timing reveals position changes, sector performance, and gaps between drivers. These details help explain developments that may not be immediately obvious from the television broadcast. 

Following the entire weekend allows fans to connect individual performances with broader trends, rather than interpreting each session in isolation. Formula 1 analysis and trends can provide additional context by highlighting patterns in driver performance, team development, and race results across the season.

A More Informed Way to Follow Formula 1

Formula 1 betting markets reflect driver ability, engineering, circuit demands, and strategy. Understanding these factors adds context without establishing a profitable betting approach. Review the exact session and settlement rules, set affordable spending and time limits, and keep essential funds separate. Choosing not to wager remains reasonable when information or conditions are unclear.

William Byron dominates for elusive first Cup victory of 2026 at Martinsville

Photo by John Knittel for SpeedwayMedia.com.

William Byron erased a season-long winless drought by notching a dominant NASCAR Cup Series victory in the Xfinity 500 at Martinsville Speedway on Sunday, November 1.

The two-time Daytona 500 champion from Charlotte, North Carolina, led three times for a race-high 362 of 500-scheduled laps in an event where he qualified in eighth place, strategically pitted under green flag from sixth place with a host of competitors on Lap 65, and utilized his fresh tires to carve his way back up the leaderboard and assume the lead for the first time on Lap 125 before he secured the first stage victory five laps later. 

Byron proceeded to lead every lap of the second stage period that was mired with four caution periods en route to the latest stage victory. He then maintained the top spot for the start of the final stage period with 238 laps remaining. Despite surrendering the lead twice throughout the final stage period to make his scheduled pit stops under green, Byron cycled back to the lead on both instances, including his final cycle atop the leaderboard with 74 laps remaining. From there, he held off teammate Chase Elliott to notch his first elusive Cup Series victory of the 2026 season and win for the first time since winning at the fall Martinsville event a year ago.

With on-track qualifying determining the starting lineup on Saturday, October 31, Denny Hamlin secured his sixth Cup pole position of the 2026 season with a pole-winning lap of 98.492 mph in 19.226 seconds. Teammate Ty Gibbs started alongside Hamlin on the front row and in the second-place starting spot with a lap at 98.241 mph in 19.275 seconds.

Prior to the event, Cody Ware dropped to the rear of the field due to unapproved adjustments that were made to his No. 51 Rick Ware Racing Ford Mustang Dark Horse entry.

When the green flag waved and the event commenced, pole-sitter Denny Hamlin, who elected to start on the outside lane, bolted his No. 11 King’s Hawaiian Toyota Camry XSE entry ahead of teammate Ty Gibbs, with Hamlin quickly transitioning to the inside lane through the first two turns. With the field of 37 competitors filing in two-by-two formation for a full cycle, Hamlin motored away to lead the first lap. After leading the second lap, however, Hamlin had a shift that did not go into gear. This caused the latter to go wide through Turns 3 and 4 as Ty Gibbs moved his No. 54 Monster Energy Toyota Camry XSE entry into the lead on the third lap.

Gibbs led Hamlin by half a second on the fifth lap, and the former retained the lead by four-tenths of a second over the latter while Ryan Preece, Kyle Larson, Joey Logano, William Byron, Alex Bowman, Chase Elliott, Austin Cindric and Josh Berry followed suit, respectively. Behind, Tyler Reddick occupied 11th place in front of Christopher Bell, Ross Chastain, Ryan Blaney, Austin Dillon, Chase Briscoe, Bubba Wallace, Chris Buescher, Todd Gilliland, Austin Hill, Connor Zilisch, Daniel Suarez, Michael McDowell, Carson Hocevar and Brad Keselowski, respectively, as Gibbs continued to lead Hamlin by three-tenths of a second at the Lap 25 mark.

Through the Lap 35 mark, Gibbs stabilized his early advantage by half a second over Hamlin while third-place Preece trailed by one-and-a-half seconds. Behind, Larson and Logano both trailed by two seconds apiece in the top-five mark and Byron trailed by three seconds in sixth place. Gibbs’ advantage over Hamlin then shrunk down to three-tenths of a second on Lap 40 and by a tenth of a second over the next five laps before Hamlin reassumed the lead on Lap 47.

By Lap 50, Hamlin led teammate Gibbs by half a second before Preece assumed the runner-up spot from Gibbs six laps later. Hamlin’s advantage increased by more than a second over Preece on Lap 60 before Bell pitted under green a lap later. More names that included Noah Gragson, Michael McDowell, AJ Allmendinger and Zane Smith would then pit before Alex Bowman, Ryan Blaney and Todd Gilliland pitted by Lap 64. Byron, Cindric, Elliott, Reddick and Chastain would all pit by Lap 65 along with Austin Hill, Shane van Gisbergen, Ty Dillon, Cole Custer, Bubba Wallace and Josh Berry while several, including Hamlin, remained on the track and opted to stretch their tires to the first stage’s conclusion.

By Lap 75, Ty Gibbs and Austin Dillon pitted as Hamlin led by two-tenths of a second over Preece. With Logano, Larson and Briscoe racing in the top-five mark, Preece overtook Hamlin for the lead nine laps later. As Preece stretched his lead by nearly two seconds over Hamlin on Lap 90, only seven competitors were scored on the lead lap amid the mix pit strategies between the competitors who elected to pit and those who remained on the track to stretch their tires to the first stage’s conclusion. By then, the leaders were mired in lapped traffic while those who pitted started to reel in and un-lap themselves from the lead lap competitors.

Just past the Lap 100 mark, Preece extended his lead up by five seconds over Hamlin while Logano, Larson, Byron, Briscoe, Gibbs, Buescher, Bell and Bowman followed suit, respectively. By then, 13 competitors were scored on the lead lap. As the laps proceeded, Hamlin started to fall off the pace with his worn tires. By Lap 110, he was overtaken by Byron for the runner-up spot before he would be overtaken by Logano a lap later for third place. Hamlin dropped to sixth place on Lap 115 before he was mired back in 13th place on Lap 120. Meanwhile, Larson was strapped in 16th place, and Briscoe was in 18th place while Bell, the latter of whom pitted, was up to fourth place.

On Lap 125, Byron overtook Preece for the lead. Despite being in heavy lapped traffic as Gibbs motored his way into the runner-up spot, Byron lapped Larson on Lap 129 as Larson faded outside the top-20 mark. By then, Hamlin and Briscoe had also plummeted towards the top-20 mark as Gibbs reeled in and intimidated Byron for the lead. 

When the first stage period concluded on Lap 130, Byron fended off Gibbs and motored his way to his fourth Cup stage victory of the 2026 season. Gibbs followed suit in second ahead of third-place Preece while Bell, Josh Berry, Alex Bowman, Austin Cindric, Ross Chastain, Tyler Reddick and Chase Elliott were scored in the top 10, respectively. With seven Chase contenders (Byron, Gibbs, Preece, Bell, Cindric, Reddick and Elliott) racking up the event’s first round of stage points, the remaining Chasers that include Wallace, Blaney, Logano, Hamlin, Briscoe, Daniel Suarez, Larson, Chris Buescher and Carson Hocevar were scored in 11th, 13th, 16th, 17th, 21st, 22nd, 23rd, 26th and 27th, respectively. By then, Suarez, the first competitor scored a lap down in 22nd place, was awarded the free pass over 23rd-place Larson as the latter along with Hamlin and Briscoe did not accumulate stage points.

Under the event’s first stage break period, 21 competitors scored on the lead lap and led by Byron pitted, including Hamlin. Following the pit stops, Byron retained the lead by exiting pit road first over Gibbs, Bell, Preece, Bowman, Cindric, Elliott, Berry, Chastain and Reddick followed suit, respectively. Meanwhile, Hamlin was mired in 15th place while Larson was ranked in 24th place and a lap down.

The second stage period started on Lap 141 as Byron and Gibbs occupied the front row. At the start, Byron used the inside lane to motor his No. 24 Liberty University Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 entry ahead of Gibbs and the field through the first two turns and the backstretch. Byron led the next lap and he proceeded to lead between two-tenths and three-tenths of a second over Gibbs between Laps 145 and 150 while Bell, Preece, Elliott, Bowman, Chastain, Cindric, Berry and Wallace followed suit in the top-10 mark, respectively. By then, Hamlin was scored in 14th place in front of Joey Logano while Larson was scored the first competitor a lap down in 24th place. 

At the Lap 160 mark, Byron was leading by half a second over Bell. The former increased his advantage by a second over the next 10 laps before the advantage stabilized at a full second on Lap 175. With Bell remaining in the runner-up spot over Gibbs, Preece and Elliott, Hamlin was racing in 15th place behind Logano, Briscoe was in 17th place and Larson was still ranked the first competitor a lap down in 23rd place.

As Byron led by one-and-a-half seconds on Lap 185, another cycle of green flag pit stops commenced as Erik Jones and Riley Herbst pitted their respective Toyotas. Chris Buescher pitted on Lap 189 before a host of names that included Noah Gragson, Suarez, Hamlin, Briscoe, McDowell, Cindric, Berry, Wallace, Blaney, Reddick, Logano, Zane Smith and Bowman pitted at and just past the Lap 190 mark. 

As the pit stops continued, the caution flew on Lap 198 when Hocevar, who was battling the leader Byron, spun in Turn 4. The caution flew just as Bell was on pit road for service, but he would then be penalized for speeding on pit road. At the time of caution, only six competitors led by Byron were scored on the lead lap. The lead lap field would pit during this caution period as Byron retained the lead. 

For the next restart on Lap 206, Byron motored away from Preece, Elliott and the field for a full cycle. As the field fanned out and bumped while jostling for spots, Byron retained the lead by two-tenths of a second over Elliott on Lap 210. Meanwhile, Austin Cindric sustained heavy damage to the front of his No. 2 Menards Ford Mustang Dark Horse entry after he rammed into the rear of Hocevar when the latter brake-checked the former following repeated bumps and contact. The damage would sideline Cindric from further contention.

Then on Lap 214, the caution flew when Logano bumped Bell into Hamlin and sent the latter two spinning up the track and towards the outside wall in the first two turns, though both managed to continue without sustaining any significant damage to their respective entries. The incident by Hamlin and Bell served as a big break for Larson, who was mired in 15th place, but was awarded the free pass to cycle back on the lead lap. During this caution period, nearly the entire lead lap field of 14 competitors led by Chastain, including Hamlin and Bell, pitted while the leaders Byron, Elliott, and Preece remained on the track.

The next restart on Lap 222 only lasted two laps when Preece, who was having a stellar run at the front and was racing in fourth place, spun through the first two turns after he got loose and lost a right-rear wheel, which caused the rest of the filed, including Gilliland, to scatter and jam on the brakes to avoid hitting Preece’s entry. By then, Byron retained the lead over Elliott and Chastain while Bell, Hamlin and Larson were scored from 12th through 14th, respectively. The following restart on Lap 232 featured Byron driving away from Elliott and the field to retain the lead. Byron’s lead stood at two-tenths of a second on Lap 235 before it stabilized on Lap 240.

At the halfway mark on Lap 250, Byron retained the lead by four-tenths of a second over Elliott. Two laps later, the caution returned when Blaney, who was racing in eighth place, spun his No. 12 Discount Tire Ford Mustang Dark Horse entry through the first two turns as he nearly collected Gilliland. Prior to Blaney’s spin, he ran into the rear of Berry and sustained heavy front nose damage. The incident caused Blaney to take his entry behind the wall with a busted radiator, which also effectively terminated his 2026 championship hopes. 

The latest caution period for Blaney’s incident concluded the second stage period as Byron was awarded his fifth Cup stage victory of the 2026 season and second of the event. Elliott settled in second ahead of Gibbs, Chastain and Logano while Wallace, Berry, Gilliland, Reddick and Bell were in the top 10. Only seven Chasers (Byron, Elliott, Gibbs, Logano, Wallace, Reddick and Bell) accumulated stage points during this second stage period while Hamlin and Larson were mired in 12th and 13th, respectively, thus leaving the latter two with no stage points for the latest stage period while Bell managed to secure one by finishing in 10th place.

During the event’s second stage break period, the lead lap field of 14 competitors led by Byron pitted. Following the pit stops, Byron exited pit road first over Elliott, Logano, Gibbs, Chastain, Wallace, Berry, Gilliland, Bell and Reddick followed suit, respectively.

With 238 laps remaining, the final stage period commenced as Byron and Elliott occupied the front row. At the start, Byron fended off Elliott to lead the next lap just before the caution quickly returned due to Cody Ware spinning through Turns 3 and 4. The next restart with 230 laps remaining featured Byron mirroring his launch from the previous restart from the outside lane to drive away from Elliott, Logano and the field to lead for a full cycle. Byron proceeded to lead by four-tenths of a second with 220 laps remaining before the advantage slightly grew by half a second with 210 laps remaining. As Elliott, Logano, Gibbs and Chastain pursued in the top five, Bell was in eight while Hamlin was mired in 14th.

As the event reached its final 200-lap mark, Byron’s advantage stood at seven-tenths of a second over Elliott, with Logano, Gibbs and Chastain trailing in the top five ahead of Wallace, Berry, Bell, Gilliland and Bowman. Behind, Reddick, van Gisbergen, Austin Dillon, Hamlin and Austin Hill were in the top 15, respectively, while Larson was mired in 16th place. Briscoe trailed Larson by three spots in 19th place as Byron added an additional two-tenths of a second to his advantage (up to nine-tenths of a second) over the next five laps. Despite having his advantage shrink back down to seven-tenths of a second with 190 laps remaining, Byron retained the top spot over Elliott.

With 175 laps remaining, Byron stabilized his lead by a second over Elliott as Logano, Gibbs and Chastain continued to occupy the remaining top-five spots. Wallace, Berry, Bell, Gilliland and van Gisbergen occupied top-10 spots over Bowman, Reddick, Austin Dillon, Hamlin and Larson, respectively, as Byron continued to lead by more than a second with 165 laps remaining.

A lap later, another cycle of green flag pit stops commenced as 23XI Racing’s Reddick and Herbst pitted. Amid the pit stops, Byron pitted from the lead with 158 laps remaining before he carved his way back to the lead 11 laps later. With the lead back in his possession, Byron led by four-tenths of a second over Elliott before the advantage grew by eight-tenths of a second with less than 130 laps remaining. By then, Logano was mired a lap down in 17th place after he made an extra pit stop to have a loose wheel addressed while Briscoe, who was leading and tried to stretch his fuel tank before he pitted, was mired back in 20th place.

Down to the final 125 laps, Byron was leading by seven-tenths of a second over Elliott while Gibbs, Wallace, Chastain, Bell, Berry, Hamlin, Reddick and Larson were scored in the top 10, respectively. Byron’s late advantage grew by more than a second over the next 10 laps before he added another second to the lead for the next 15 laps. By then, Bell slipped to seventh place while Hamlin raced in ninth place ahead of Larson. 

Then with 85 laps remaining, a final cycle of green-flag pit stops commenced as Bell pitted. Hamlin would also pit along with Bowman before Byron pitted with 79 laps remaining. As the pit stops cycled through, Briscoe cycled to the lead before Byron reassumed it with 74 laps remaining. As Byron led by two-and-a-half seconds with 70 laps remaining, his advantage slightly shrunk by more than one-and-a-half seconds over Elliott down to the final 60-lap mark as Gibbs, Berry, Wallace, Hamlin and Bell followed suit, respectively, with Larson in 10th place.

Down to the final 50 laps, only 10 competitors were scored on the lead lap as Byron continued to lead by more than a second over Elliott. By then, Larson was the last competitor scored on the lead lap in 10th place while Hamlin and Bell were in sixth and eighth, respectively. Over the next 10 laps, Larson would be lapped as Byron maintained the lead by nine-tenths of a second.

As the event reached its final 30-lap mark, Byron stretched his late lead back up by more than a second over Elliott. Byron’s advantage stood beyond a second with 20 laps remaining before it grew by more than two seconds with 10 laps remaining. By then, Hamlin was in sixth place while Bell was racing in front of Larson in ninth place.

When the white flag waved and the final lap started, Byron remained in the lead by more than two seconds over Elliott. With Elliott unable to reel in his teammate, Byron smoothly navigated his entry around Martinsville for a final time before he cycled back to the frontstretch for his first elusive checkered flag of this season.

With the victory, Byron notched his 17th career win in the NASCAR Cup Series division, his fourth at Martinsville, second in a row at the fall Martinsville event and. Byron, who extended his current Cup race-winning streak to seven consecutive seasons, achieved the sixth victory of 2026 for Hendrick Motorsports, the organization’s 33rd win at Martinsville and the 10th victory of this season for Chevrolet.

Despite having his championship hopes for 2026 evaporated, Byron’s Martinsville victory, which boosted the driver of the No. 24 entry from 11th to ninth in the Chase standings, left him ecstatic at achieving a race victory to this season’s column amid a roller coaster stretch. 

No. 24
Photo by John Knittel for SpeedwayMedia.com.

“We’re always pretty good here,” Byron said on the frontstretch on USA Sports. “Man, it’s been a freaking long road this year. This team’s worked really hard, and I just appreciate them. We’ve had our struggles, but man, today feels damn good. Thanks to Mr. Hendrick and thanks to everyone working really hard at the shop. Man, we never quit. There’s something to be said about that. It’s always a really unique and important opportunity when you drive for Hendrick Motorsports to come here and try to do well. It just all came together for us. Pretty happy.”

Amid Byron’s race victory, Denny Hamlin finished in sixth place while Kyle Larson and Christopher Bell both finished a lap down in ninth and 10th, respectively. As a result, Larson will enter next weekend’s finale at Homestead-Miami Speedway with a 67-point advantage over Bell and 70 over Hamlin as the latter three will square off against one another for the 2026 Cup Series championship.

“I’m happy, but I’m also bummed because there’s just a lot of opportunity there in the stages,” Larson said. “We were just on the wrong side of the strategy…was just struggling for grip there about the last 50 laps. Unfortunately, [I] went down a lap there right at the end. That hurt the second stage. Thankfully, we were able to get back to the lead lap, though. It all could have been a lot worse tonight, so look at the positives from that. Go to Homestead next week with a comfortable gap, but still not locked up. [I] Would love to get a couple good first stages and then pound it in the third stage.”

“It just really came down to Stage 1 with us running the no stop strategy,” Hamlin said. “[We] Lost all of our track position there. Once we lost our track position, it’s hard to drive back to the front. Nobody else did. [I] didn’t capitalize today on Larson not getting any stage points and stuff like that. The first stage was the killer for us that set us back…It was just a lot of unfortunate timing of some things, but for us, this weekend, it was about everything to gain, nothing to lose, and we just didn’t gain enough to make it realistic. I feel confident that I’ll be able to go [to Homestead] and contend. I’d love to get another win before the end of the year. I thought it was going to come today, but we’ll have to get one more shot at it next week and see if we can’t get just one more win.”

“All in all, 10th is probably about where we stacked up,” Bell said. “It was a really hectic day, and it is what it is. [Homestead]’s just another race, another opportunity to fight for a win. I think we know.”

Chase Elliott, who won at Martinsville in April, settled in second place ahead of Ty Gibbs, Josh Berry and Shane van Gisbergen. Austin Dillon and Bubba Wallace finished seventh and eighth, respectively, as Chase contenders Tyler Reddick, Chase Briscoe, Joey Logano, Carson Hocevar, Ryan Preece, Chris Buescher, Daniel Suarez, Ryan Blaney and Austin Cindric ended up 12th, 14th, 18th, 21st, 23rd, 24th, 28th, 35th and 36th, respectively. 

The penultimate Cup Series’ Chase event of the 2026 season at Martinsville saw 11 lead changes among six leaders, and six cautions over 47 laps. In addition, only seven of 37 starters finished on the lead lap.

Results:

  1. William Byron, 362 laps led, Stages 1 & 2 winner
  2. Chase Elliott
  3. Ty Gibbs, 44 laps led
  4. Josh Berry
  5. Shane van Gisbergen
  6. Denny Hamlin, 40 laps led
  7. Austin Dillon
  8. Bubba Wallace, one lap down
  9. Kyle Larson, one lap down
  10. Christopher Bell, one lap down
  11. Ross Chastain, one lap down, seven laps led
  12. Tyler Reddick, one lap down
  13. Alex Bowman, one lap down
  14. Chase Briscoe, one lap down, six laps led
  15. Todd Gilliland, one lap down
  16. Michael McDowell, one lap down
  17. Connor Zilisch, one lap down
  18. Joey Logano, two laps down
  19. Zane Smith, two laps down
  20. Austin Hill, two laps down
  21. Carson Hocevar, two laps down
  22. Ty Dillon, two laps down
  23. Ryan Preece, two laps down, 41 laps led
  24. Chris Buescher, three laps down
  25. AJ Allmendinger, three laps down
  26. Noah Gragson, three laps down
  27. Brad Keselowski, three laps down
  28. Daniel Suarez, three laps down
  29. Erik Jones, three laps down
  30. Ricky Stenhouse Jr., three laps down
  31. John Hunter Nemechek, four laps down
  32. Riley Herbst, five laps down
  33. Cody Ware, six laps down
  34. Cole Custer, 13 laps down
  35. Ryan Blaney, 59 laps down
  36. Austin Cindric – OUT, Accident
  37. Josh Bilicki – OUT, Clutch

After the ninth Chase event of the 2026 NASCAR Cup Series season, Kyle Larson leads the standings by 67 points over Christopher Bell and 70 over Denny Hamlin. The rest of the 16-car Chase field is displayed below, with the remaining Chasers starting with fourth-place Chase Briscoe being mathematically eliminated from championship contention.

Chase Standings:

  1. Kyle Larson
  2. Christopher Bell -67
  3. Denny Hamlin -70
  4. Chase Briscoe -84
  5. Joey Logano -103
  6. Tyler Reddick -125
  7. Ryan Blaney -133
  8. Ty Gibbs -160
  9. William Byron -166
  10. Chase Elliott -201
  11. Austin Cindric -206
  12. Carson Hocevar -210
  13. Bubba Wallace -212
  14. Ryan Preece -255
  15. Daniel Suarez -259
  16. Chris Buescher -270

The 2026 NASCAR Cup Series season is set to conclude next Sunday, November 8, at Homestead-Miami Speedway in Homestead, Florida, where a champion will be crowned. The event’s broadcast is slated to commence at 3 p.m. ET on NBC, MRN Radio, SiriusXM, and HBO MAX.